
Radeon E8860 vs Radeon HD 7750

Radeon E8860
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon E8860 is positioned at rank #451 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon E8860
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon E8860.
| Insight | Radeon E8860 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 68.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon E8860 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+68.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon E8860 and Radeon HD 7750

Radeon E8860
The Radeon E8860 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,686 points.

Radeon HD 7750
The Radeon HD 7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,703 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon E8860 scores 1,686 and the Radeon HD 7750 reaches 1,703 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E8860 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 7750 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon E8860) vs 512 (Radeon HD 7750). Raw compute: 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8860) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750). Boost clocks: 625 MHz vs 800 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon E8860 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,686 | 1,703+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+25% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8 TFLOPS | 0.8192 TFLOPS+2% |
| Boost Clock | 625 MHz | 800 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+25% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon E8860 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon E8860 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7750 has 4 GB. The Radeon HD 7750 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon E8860 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon E8860 draws 37W versus the Radeon HD 7750's 55W — a 39.1% difference. The Radeon E8860 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E8860) vs 300W (Radeon HD 7750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon E8860 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 37W-33% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60°C |
| Perf/Watt | 45.6+47% | 31.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon E8860 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon HD 7750 launched at $109 and now averages $30. The Radeon HD 7750 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.7 (Radeon E8860) vs 56.8 (Radeon HD 7750) — the Radeon HD 7750 offers 68.5% better value. The Radeon E8860 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon E8860 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $109-64% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $30-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.7 | 56.8+69% |
| Codename | Venus | Cape Verde |
| Release | January 25 2014 | February 15 2012 |
| Ranking | #734 | #731 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















