
Radeon E8860 vs GRID M10-2B

Radeon E8860
Popular choices:

GRID M10-2B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon E8860 is positioned at rank 451 and the GRID M10-2B is on rank 372, so the GRID M10-2B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon E8860
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-2B
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon E8860 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-2B.
| Insight | Radeon E8860 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon E8860 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon E8860 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $80), it costs 38% less, resulting in a 64.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon E8860 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+64.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon E8860 and GRID M10-2B

Radeon E8860
The Radeon E8860 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,686 points.

GRID M10-2B
The GRID M10-2B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,644 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon E8860 scores 1,686 and the GRID M10-2B reaches 1,644 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E8860 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID M10-2B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon E8860) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-2B). Raw compute: 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8860) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2B). Boost clocks: 625 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon E8860 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,686+3% | 1,644 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2048+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+503% |
| Boost Clock | 625 MHz | 1178 MHz+88% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 768 KB+380% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon E8860 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon E8860) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-2B) — the GRID M10-2B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon E8860 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon E8860 draws 37W versus the GRID M10-2B's 225W — a 143.5% difference. The Radeon E8860 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E8860) vs 350W (GRID M10-2B). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon E8860 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 37W-84% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 45.6+525% | 7.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon E8860 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GRID M10-2B launched at $2500 and now averages $80. The Radeon E8860 costs 37.5% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.7 (Radeon E8860) vs 20.6 (GRID M10-2B) — the Radeon E8860 offers 63.6% better value. The GRID M10-2B is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon E8860 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-88% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-38% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.7+64% | 20.6 |
| Codename | Venus | GM204 |
| Release | January 25 2014 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #734 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















