CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 2350
Popular choices:
nForce 750a SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 2350 is positioned at rank #322 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2350
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The nForce 750a SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 2350.
| Insight | Radeon HD 2350 | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+7.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the nForce 750a SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 2350 and nForce 750a SLI
Radeon HD 2350
The Radeon HD 2350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 77 points. Launch price was $449.
nForce 750a SLI
The nForce 750a SLI is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 83 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 2350 scores 77 versus the nForce 750a SLI's 83 — the nForce 750a SLI leads by 7.8%. The Radeon HD 2350 is built on GCN 1.0 while the nForce 750a SLI uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon HD 2350) vs 768 (nForce 750a SLI).
| Feature | Radeon HD 2350 | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 77 | 83+8% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+133% | 768 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 2350 | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 2350 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the nForce 750a SLI has 512 MB. The nForce 750a SLI offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2350 | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 2350 draws 200W versus the nForce 750a SLI's 30W — a 147.8% difference. The nForce 750a SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2350) vs 350W (nForce 750a SLI). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2350 | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 30W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 2.8+600% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 2350 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $48, while the nForce 750a SLI launched at $0 and now averages $0. The nForce 750a SLI costs 100+% less ($48 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.6 (Radeon HD 2350) vs Infinity (nForce 750a SLI) — the nForce 750a SLI offers Infinity% better value. The nForce 750a SLI is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 2350 | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $48 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | Tahiti | N14P-GT |
| Release | January 31 2012 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #454 | #616 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 2350 and nForce 750a SLI
