Radeon HD 2350 vs Radeon HD 3200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 2350 vs Radeon HD 3200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 2350 vs Radeon HD 3200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 2350

2012

Why buy it

✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 3200

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 3200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 6.5% in PassMark G3D (82 vs 77), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 2350 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 3200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $50 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 6.5% (1.6 vs 1.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 3200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 2350 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 2350 vs Radeon HD 3200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 2350

The Radeon HD 2350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 77 points. Launch price was $449.

Radeon HD 3200

The Radeon HD 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 2350 scores 77 versus the Radeon HD 3200's 82 — the Radeon HD 3200 leads by 6.5%. The Radeon HD 2350 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 3200 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon HD 2350) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 3200). Raw compute: 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2350) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3200).

Feature	Radeon HD 2350	Radeon HD 3200
G3D Mark Score	77	82+6%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	TeraScale 3
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1792+40%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.867 TFLOPS+49%	1.92 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	112+40%	80
L1 Cache	448 KB+40%	320 KB
L2 Cache	768 KB+50%	512 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 2350	Radeon HD 3200
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 2350 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3200 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 3200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2350 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3200. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon HD 2350) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 3200) — the Radeon HD 2350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 2350	Radeon HD 3200
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	768 KB+50%	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 2350 draws 200W versus the Radeon HD 3200's 186W — a 7.3% difference. The Radeon HD 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2350) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3200). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon HD 2350	Radeon HD 3200
TDP	200W	186W-7%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	0.4	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 2350 came in at $50, while the Radeon HD 3200 launched at $50. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (Radeon HD 2350) vs 1.6 (Radeon HD 3200) — the Radeon HD 3200 offers 6.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 2350 (2012 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon HD 2350	Radeon HD 3200
MSRP	$50	$50
Performance per Dollar	1.5	1.6+7%
Codename	Tahiti	Cayman
Release	January 31 2012	December 1 2011
Ranking	#454	#598

Search Radeon HD 2350 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 3200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.