Radeon HD 2350
VS
Quadro FX 540

Radeon HD 2350 vs Quadro FX 540

AMD

Radeon HD 2350

2012Boost: 1250 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 540

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 2350 is positioned at rank 322 and the Quadro FX 540 is on rank 397, so the Radeon HD 2350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2350

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
4710%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4525%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
4473%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4465%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4456%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
4431%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
4375%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4358%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4318%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
4306%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
4255%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4245%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
4169%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4166%
#307
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
5195%
#322
Radeon HD 2350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $48
100%
#323
Radeon HD 2400
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
99%
#324
Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
98%
#326
GeForce 7300 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $20
90%
#327
Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $40
85%
#329
GeForce 7950 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
75%
#330
RADEON X550XT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $40
73%
#334
Radeon X1650 Pro
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
55%
#336
RADEON X550
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
55%
#337
Radeon HD 8350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $39
53%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 540

#382
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
54715%
#397
Quadro FX 540
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
100%
#398
Quadro 7000
MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300
89%
#399
Quadro FX 1500
MSRP: $699|Avg: $30
89%
#400
Tesla M2070-Q
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50
89%
#401
Quadro FX 4700 X2
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15
85%
#402
Quadro FX 3700
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500
85%
#403
GRID M10-0B
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000
81%
#405
GRID K340
MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57
74%
#406
Quadro FX 4600
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50
74%
#407
Quadro FX 5600
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50
67%
#409
Quadro FX 3500
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
63%
#410
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
59%
#411
GRID K1
MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120
59%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 540 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 2350 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon HD 2350Quadro FX 540
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-5.2%)
Leading raw performance (+5.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro FX 540 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 540 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $48), it costs 69% less, resulting in a 236.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 2350Quadro FX 540
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+236.6%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($48)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 2350 and Quadro FX 540

AMD

Radeon HD 2350

The Radeon HD 2350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 77 points. Launch price was $449.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 540

The Quadro FX 540 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 2350 scores 77 versus the Quadro FX 540's 81 — the Quadro FX 540 leads by 5.2%. The Radeon HD 2350 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro FX 540 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon HD 2350) vs 240 (Quadro FX 540). Raw compute: 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2350) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 540).

FeatureRadeon HD 2350Quadro FX 540
G3D Mark Score
77
81+5%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
1792+647%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.867 TFLOPS+361%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
112+40%
80
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 2350Quadro FX 540
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 2350 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 540 has 128 MB. The Radeon HD 2350 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon HD 2350) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 540) — the Radeon HD 2350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 2350Quadro FX 540
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB+100%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 2350 draws 200W versus the Quadro FX 540's 189W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2350) vs 350W (Quadro FX 540). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 2350Quadro FX 540
TDP
200W
189W-6%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
0.4
0.4
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 2350 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $48, while the Quadro FX 540 launched at $299 and now averages $15. The Quadro FX 540 costs 68.8% less ($33 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.6 (Radeon HD 2350) vs 5.4 (Quadro FX 540) — the Quadro FX 540 offers 237.5% better value. The Radeon HD 2350 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon HD 2350Quadro FX 540
MSRP
$50-83%
$299
Avg Price (30d)
$48
$15-69%
Performance per Dollar
1.6
5.4+238%
Codename
Tahiti
GT200B
Release
January 31 2012
November 11 2008
Ranking
#454
#815