Radeon HD 2400 XT
VS
GeForce 8300 GS

Radeon HD 2400 XT vs GeForce 8300 GS

AMD

Radeon HD 2400 XT

2012Core: 925 MHzBoost: 975 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 8300 GS

2014Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 2400 XT is positioned at rank 324 and the GeForce 8300 GS is on rank 625, so the Radeon HD 2400 XT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2400 XT

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
4804%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4615%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
4562%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4554%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4544%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
4519%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
4462%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4445%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4404%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
4392%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
4339%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4330%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
4252%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4249%
#309
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
5298%
#324
Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
100%
#326
GeForce 7300 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $20
92%
#327
Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $40
87%
#329
GeForce 7950 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
77%
#330
RADEON X550XT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $40
74%
#335
Radeon X1650 Pro
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
56%
#336
RADEON X550
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
56%
#337
Radeon HD 8350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $39
54%
#339
Radeon X1950 GT
MSRP: $140|Avg: $49
50%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8300 GS

#615
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
4720%
#617
4279%
#618
4268%
#622
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3881%
#623
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3854%
#625
GeForce 8300 GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
100%
#626
99%
#627
98%
#628
GeForce 9500M GS
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
97%
#629
GeForce 8800 GS
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
96%
#631
GeForce 9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $50
93%
#632
Mobility Radeon X1700
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
93%
#633
Mobility Radeon HD 560v
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
92%
#634
GeForce 9300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
92%
#635
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
MSRP: $899|Avg: $400
91%
#636
GeForce 8400M G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
91%
#637
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
90%
#638
GeForce 8400M GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
90%
#639
GeForce 9100
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
89%
#640
GeForce 8300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 2400 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 8300 GS offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon HD 2400 XTGeForce 8300 GS
Performance
Leading raw performance (+3.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 2400 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 2400 XT holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $50), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 417.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 2400 XTGeForce 8300 GS
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+417.4%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 2400 XT and GeForce 8300 GS

AMD

Radeon HD 2400 XT

The Radeon HD 2400 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 119 points. Launch price was $270.

NVIDIA

GeForce 8300 GS

The GeForce 8300 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 2400 XT scores 119 and the GeForce 8300 GS reaches 115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 2400 XT is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 8300 GS uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 256 (GeForce 8300 GS). Raw compute: 2.995 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 8300 GS). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 1150 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 2400 XTGeForce 8300 GS
G3D Mark Score
119+3%
115
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536+500%
256
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.995 TFLOPS+409%
0.5888 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
975 MHz
1150 MHz+18%
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
96+500%
16
L1 Cache
384 KB+200%
128 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 2400 XTGeForce 8300 GS
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 2400 XT comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8300 GS has 512 MB. The GeForce 8300 GS offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 1 MB (GeForce 8300 GS) — the GeForce 8300 GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 2400 XTGeForce 8300 GS
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 2400 XT draws 185W versus the GeForce 8300 GS's 33W — a 139.4% difference. The GeForce 8300 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 350W (GeForce 8300 GS). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy.

FeatureRadeon HD 2400 XTGeForce 8300 GS
TDP
185W
33W-82%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Legacy
Length
170mm
Height
106mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
0.6
3.5+483%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 2400 XT launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce 8300 GS launched at $50 and now averages $50. The Radeon HD 2400 XT costs 80% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.9 (Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 2.3 (GeForce 8300 GS) — the Radeon HD 2400 XT offers 417.4% better value. The GeForce 8300 GS is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon HD 2400 XTGeForce 8300 GS
MSRP
$79
$50-37%
Avg Price (30d)
$10-80%
$50
Performance per Dollar
11.9+417%
2.3
Codename
Tahiti
GM108
Release
November 19 2012
July 22 2014
Ranking
#469
#832