Radeon HD 2400 XT
VS
GeForce 9500M G

Radeon HD 2400 XT vs GeForce 9500M G

AMD

Radeon HD 2400 XT

2012Core: 925 MHzBoost: 975 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 9500M G

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 1020 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 2400 XT is positioned at rank 324 and the GeForce 9500M G is on rank 519, so the Radeon HD 2400 XT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2400 XT

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
4804%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4615%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
4562%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4554%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4544%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
4519%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
4462%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4445%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4404%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
4392%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
4339%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4330%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
4252%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4249%
#309
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
5298%
#324
Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
100%
#326
GeForce 7300 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $20
92%
#327
Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $40
87%
#329
GeForce 7950 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
77%
#330
RADEON X550XT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $40
74%
#335
Radeon X1650 Pro
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
56%
#336
RADEON X550
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
56%
#337
Radeon HD 8350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $39
54%
#339
Radeon X1950 GT
MSRP: $140|Avg: $49
50%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9500M G

#509
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2668%
#511
2418%
#512
2412%
#516
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2193%
#517
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2178%
#519
GeForce 9500M G
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
100%
#520
100%
#521
99%
#522
Radeon HD 8550G + 8500M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#523
Radeon HD 8610G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#524
98%
#525
97%
#526
Mobility Radeon HD 4830
MSRP: $130|Avg: $20
97%
#527
97%
#528
Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#529
Radeon HD 7660G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
96%
#530
Mobility Radeon HD 4550
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
96%
#531
96%
#532
Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
95%
#533
95%
#534
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 9500M G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 2400 XT.

InsightRadeon HD 2400 XTGeForce 9500M G
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%)
Leading raw performance (+2.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 2400 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 2400 XT holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $30), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 192.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 2400 XTGeForce 9500M G
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+192.6%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 2400 XT and GeForce 9500M G

AMD

Radeon HD 2400 XT

The Radeon HD 2400 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 119 points. Launch price was $270.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9500M G

The GeForce 9500M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 2400 XT scores 119 and the GeForce 9500M G reaches 122 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 2400 XT is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 9500M G uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 640 (GeForce 9500M G). Raw compute: 2.995 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 9500M G). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 1020 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 2400 XTGeForce 9500M G
G3D Mark Score
119
122+3%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536+140%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.995 TFLOPS+129%
1.306 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
975 MHz
1020 MHz+5%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
96+140%
40
L1 Cache
384 KB+20%
320 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 2400 XTGeForce 9500M G
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 2400 XT comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9500M G has 512 MB. The GeForce 9500M G offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 2 MB (GeForce 9500M G) — the GeForce 9500M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 2400 XTGeForce 9500M G
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 2400 XT draws 185W versus the GeForce 9500M G's 75W — a 84.6% difference. The GeForce 9500M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 350W (GeForce 9500M G). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy.

FeatureRadeon HD 2400 XTGeForce 9500M G
TDP
185W
75W-59%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
0.6
1.6+167%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 2400 XT launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce 9500M G launched at $30 and now averages $30. The Radeon HD 2400 XT costs 66.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.9 (Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 4.1 (GeForce 9500M G) — the Radeon HD 2400 XT offers 190.2% better value. The GeForce 9500M G is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon HD 2400 XTGeForce 9500M G
MSRP
$79
$30-62%
Avg Price (30d)
$10-67%
$30
Performance per Dollar
11.9+190%
4.1
Codename
Tahiti
GM107
Release
November 19 2012
October 27 2015
Ranking
#469
#671