Radeon HD 2900 XT
VS
FirePro M7740

Radeon HD 2900 XT vs FirePro M7740

AMD

Radeon HD 2900 XT

2013Core: 725 MHz
VS

FirePro M7740

2012Core: 675 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is positioned at rank 666 and the FirePro M7740 is on rank 329, so the FirePro M7740 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2900 XT

#656
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
6580%
#658
5965%
#659
5949%
#663
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
5410%
#664
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
5373%
#666
Radeon HD 2900 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $20
100%
#667
Mobility Radeon 4100
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
100%
#668
GeForce 9700M GT
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
99%
#669
GeForce 9300 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#670
Mobility Radeon X2500
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#671
Radeon HD 7520G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $57
92%
#672
GeForce 9800M GTX
MSRP: $300|Avg: $30
92%
#673
90%
#674
GeForce 505
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
88%
#675
GeForce 9200M GE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
87%
#676
Mobility Radeon. HD 5470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
87%
#677
Radeon HD 2600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $40
86%
#678
GeForce 7500 LE
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
86%
#679
GeForce 9650M GT
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
83%
#680
GeForce 9650M GS
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
82%
#681
GeForce 8400 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro M7740

#314
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
11108%
#329
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
100%
#330
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
98%
#331
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
97%
#332
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
96%
#334
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
95%
#335
Tesla C2050
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95
95%
#336
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
95%
#337
Quadro FX 3450
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
94%
#338
GRID P40-24Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200
93%
#339
Quadro 4000
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30
92%
#340
FireStream 9250
MSRP: $999|Avg: $49
88%
#341
GRID P40-3Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
86%
#342
GRID M10-2Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
81%
#343
Tesla K80
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50
80%
#344
GRID M10-4Q
MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro M7740 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 2900 XT.

InsightRadeon HD 2900 XTFirePro M7740
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 2900 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 2900 XT holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $500), it costs 96% less, resulting in a 2381.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 2900 XTFirePro M7740
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2381.2%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 2900 XT and FirePro M7740

AMD

Radeon HD 2900 XT

The Radeon HD 2900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 660 points.

AMD

FirePro M7740

The FirePro M7740 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 665 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 2900 XT scores 660 and the FirePro M7740 reaches 665 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is built on TeraScale 2 while the FirePro M7740 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 512 (FirePro M7740). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M7740).

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTFirePro M7740
G3D Mark Score
660
665
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480
512+7%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.696 TFLOPS
0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
48 KB
128 KB+167%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTFirePro M7740
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTFirePro M7740
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 10.1 (FirePro M7740). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTFirePro M7740
DirectX
10.0
10.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD+ (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs None (FirePro M7740). Decoder: UVD+ vs UVD 2. Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M7740).

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTFirePro M7740
Encoder
UVD+
None
Decoder
UVD+
UVD 2
Codecs
H.264
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 2900 XT draws 25W versus the FirePro M7740's 33W — a 27.6% difference. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 350W (FirePro M7740). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTFirePro M7740
TDP
25W-24%
33W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
26.4+31%
20.2
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 2900 XT launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the FirePro M7740 launched at $500 and now averages $500. The Radeon HD 2900 XT costs 96% less ($480 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.0 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 1.3 (FirePro M7740) — the Radeon HD 2900 XT offers 2438.5% better value. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTFirePro M7740
MSRP
$399-20%
$500
Avg Price (30d)
$20-96%
$500
Performance per Dollar
33.0+2438%
1.3
Codename
Thames
Chelsea
Release
January 7 2013
June 27 2012
Ranking
#883
#752