
Radeon HD 2900 XT
Popular choices:

FirePro M7740
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is positioned at rank 666 and the FirePro M7740 is on rank 329, so the FirePro M7740 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2900 XT
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M7740
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro M7740 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 2900 XT.
| Insight | Radeon HD 2900 XT | FirePro M7740 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 2900 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 2900 XT holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $500), it costs 96% less, resulting in a 2381.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 2900 XT | FirePro M7740 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2381.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 2900 XT and FirePro M7740

Radeon HD 2900 XT
The Radeon HD 2900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 660 points.

FirePro M7740
The FirePro M7740 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 665 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 2900 XT scores 660 and the FirePro M7740 reaches 665 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is built on TeraScale 2 while the FirePro M7740 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 512 (FirePro M7740). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M7740).
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | FirePro M7740 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 660 | 665 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 512+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.696 TFLOPS | 0.6912 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 128 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | FirePro M7740 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | FirePro M7740 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 10.1 (FirePro M7740). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | FirePro M7740 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD+ (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs None (FirePro M7740). Decoder: UVD+ vs UVD 2. Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M7740).
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | FirePro M7740 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD+ | None |
| Decoder | UVD+ | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 2900 XT draws 25W versus the FirePro M7740's 33W — a 27.6% difference. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 350W (FirePro M7740). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | FirePro M7740 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-24% | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 26.4+31% | 20.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 2900 XT launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the FirePro M7740 launched at $500 and now averages $500. The Radeon HD 2900 XT costs 96% less ($480 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.0 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 1.3 (FirePro M7740) — the Radeon HD 2900 XT offers 2438.5% better value. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | FirePro M7740 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-20% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-96% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.0+2438% | 1.3 |
| Codename | Thames | Chelsea |
| Release | January 7 2013 | June 27 2012 |
| Ranking | #883 | #752 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















