Radeon HD 2900 XT vs GeForce GT 530
Radeon HD 2900 XT
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 530
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is positioned at rank 666 and the GeForce GT 530 is on rank 189, so the GeForce GT 530 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2900 XT
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 530
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 530 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 2900 XT.
| Insight | Radeon HD 2900 XT | GeForce GT 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 530 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 530 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $20), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 2900 XT | GeForce GT 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 2900 XT and GeForce GT 530
Radeon HD 2900 XT
The Radeon HD 2900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 660 points.
GeForce GT 530
The GeForce GT 530 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 662 points. Launch price was $159.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 2900 XT scores 660 and the GeForce GT 530 reaches 662 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GT 530 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 768 (GeForce GT 530). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 530).
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | GeForce GT 530 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 660 | 662 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 768+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.696 TFLOPS | 1.825 TFLOPS+162% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 48+100% |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 288 KB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | GeForce GT 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 2900 XT comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 530 has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 530 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 1 MB (GeForce GT 530) — the GeForce GT 530 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | GeForce GT 530 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 530). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | GeForce GT 530 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 12 (11_0)+20% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD+ (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GT 530). Decoder: UVD+ vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 530).
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | GeForce GT 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD+ | No NVENC (Fermi) |
| Decoder | UVD+ | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 2900 XT draws 25W versus the GeForce GT 530's 90W — a 113% difference. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 250W (GeForce GT 530). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | GeForce GT 530 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-72% | 90W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 241mm | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 26.4+257% | 7.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 2900 XT launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce GT 530 launched at $100 and now averages $20. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.0 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 33.1 (GeForce GT 530) — the GeForce GT 530 offers 0.3% better value. The GeForce GT 530 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | GeForce GT 530 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $100-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.0 | 33.1 |
| Codename | Thames | GM206 |
| Release | January 7 2013 | August 20 2015 |
| Ranking | #883 | #425 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 2900 XT and GeForce GT 530
