Radeon HD 2900 XT
VS
GeForce RTX 2060

Radeon HD 2900 XT vs GeForce RTX 2060

AMD

Radeon HD 2900 XT

2013Core: 725 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2060

2019Core: 1365 MHzBoost: 1680 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is positioned at rank #666 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2900 XT

#656
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
6580%
#658
5965%
#659
5949%
#663
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
5410%
#664
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
5373%
#666
Radeon HD 2900 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $20
100%
#667
Mobility Radeon 4100
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
100%
#668
GeForce 9700M GT
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
99%
#669
GeForce 9300 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#670
Mobility Radeon X2500
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#671
Radeon HD 7520G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $57
92%
#672
GeForce 9800M GTX
MSRP: $300|Avg: $30
92%
#673
90%
#674
GeForce 505
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
88%
#675
GeForce 9200M GE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
87%
#676
Mobility Radeon. HD 5470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
87%
#677
Radeon HD 2600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $40
86%
#678
GeForce 7500 LE
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
86%
#679
GeForce 9650M GT
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
83%
#680
GeForce 9650M GS
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
82%
#681
GeForce 8400 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 2060 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 2060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 2900 XT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2038.5% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (6 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 2900 XT.

InsightRadeon HD 2900 XTGeForce RTX 2060
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2038.5%)
Leading raw performance (+2038.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $120 (vs $20), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 256.4% better value per dollar than the Radeon HD 2900 XT.

InsightRadeon HD 2900 XTGeForce RTX 2060
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+256.4%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 2900 XT and GeForce RTX 2060

AMD

Radeon HD 2900 XT

The Radeon HD 2900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 660 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 2900 XT scores 660 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 2038.5%. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060).

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTGeForce RTX 2060
G3D Mark Score
660
14,114+2038%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Turing
Process Node
40 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
480
1920+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.696 TFLOPS
6.451 TFLOPS+827%
ROPs
8
48+500%
TMUs
24
120+400%
L1 Cache
0.05 MB
1.9 MB+3700%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
3 MB+1100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTGeForce RTX 2060
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 2900 XT comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTGeForce RTX 2060
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
6 GB+500%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
336 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
192-bit+50%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
3 MB+1100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTGeForce RTX 2060
DirectX
10.0
12 Ultimate (12_2)+20%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD+ (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: UVD+ vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTGeForce RTX 2060
Encoder
UVD+
NVENC (Turing)
Decoder
UVD+
NVDEC (Turing)
Codecs
H.264
H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 2900 XT draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 145.9% difference. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTGeForce RTX 2060
TDP
25W-84%
160W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
8-pin
Length
241mm
229mm
Height
113mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
72
Perf/Watt
26.4
88.2+234%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 2900 XT launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The Radeon HD 2900 XT costs 83.3% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.0 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 256.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTGeForce RTX 2060
MSRP
$399
$349-13%
Avg Price (30d)
$20-83%
$120
Performance per Dollar
33.0
117.6+256%
Codename
Thames
TU106
Release
January 7 2013
January 7 2019
Ranking
#883
#168