Radeon HD 3000 vs GeForce 9400M G
Radeon HD 3000
Popular choices:
GeForce 9400M G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 3000 is positioned at rank 316 and the GeForce 9400M G is on rank 650, so the Radeon HD 3000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9400M G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 3000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9400M G.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3000 | GeForce 9400M G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 3000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 3000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $10), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3000 | GeForce 9400M G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 3000 and GeForce 9400M G
Radeon HD 3000
The Radeon HD 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 96 points. Launch price was $180.
GeForce 9400M G
The GeForce 9400M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 94 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 3000 scores 96 and the GeForce 9400M G reaches 94 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 3000 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce 9400M G uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 3000) vs 384 (GeForce 9400M G). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3000) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400M G).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3000 | GeForce 9400M G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 96+2% | 94 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+233% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.92 TFLOPS+113% | 0.9032 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+67% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 3000 | GeForce 9400M G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 3000 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9400M G has 256 MB. The Radeon HD 3000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 3000) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9400M G) — the GeForce 9400M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3000 | GeForce 9400M G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (Radeon HD 3000) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9400M G). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3000 | GeForce 9400M G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.1 (10_0)+11% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (Radeon HD 3000) vs None (GeForce 9400M G). Decoder: UVD vs PureVideo HD (VP3).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3000 | GeForce 9400M G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | None |
| Decoder | UVD | PureVideo HD (VP3) |
| Codecs | — | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 3000 draws 186W versus the GeForce 9400M G's 33W — a 139.7% difference. The GeForce 9400M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3000) vs 350W (GeForce 9400M G). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3000 | GeForce 9400M G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 186W | 33W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 2.8+460% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 3000 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce 9400M G launched at $50 and now averages $10. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.6 (Radeon HD 3000) vs 9.4 (GeForce 9400M G) — the Radeon HD 3000 offers 2.1% better value. The GeForce 9400M G is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3000 | GeForce 9400M G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.6+2% | 9.4 |
| Codename | Cayman | GM108 |
| Release | December 1 2011 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #598 | #847 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 3000 and GeForce 9400M G
