Radeon HD 3000 vs Quadro FX 570M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 3000 is positioned at rank 316 and the Quadro FX 570M is on rank 404, so the Radeon HD 3000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3000

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

3778%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

3630%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

3588%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

3581%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

3574%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

3554%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

3509%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

3496%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

3464%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

3454%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

3413%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

3405%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

3344%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

3342%

#301

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

4167%

#316

Radeon HD 3000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

100%

#317

Radeon HD 6250

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

98%

#318

GeForce GT 120

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

98%

#319

GeForce 6600 LE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

89%

#320

Radeon HD 3670

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

88%

#321

Radeon HD 3200

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

85%

#322

Radeon HD 2350

MSRP: $50|Avg: $48

80%

#323

Radeon HD 2400

MSRP: $79|Avg: $10

80%

#324

Radeon HD 2400 XT

MSRP: $79|Avg: $10

79%

#326

GeForce 7300 GT

MSRP: $89|Avg: $20

72%

#327

Radeon HD 3870 X2

MSRP: $449|Avg: $40

68%

#329

GeForce 7950 GT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $50

60%

#330

RADEON X550XT

MSRP: $50|Avg: $40

58%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 570M

#389

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

73865%

#404

Quadro FX 570M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#405

GRID K340

MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57

100%

#406

Quadro FX 4600

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50

100%

#407

Quadro FX 5600

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50

90%

#408

Quadro FX 3500

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

85%

#410

Quadro FX 1400

MSRP: $799|Avg: $30

80%

#411

GRID K1

MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120

80%

#413

GRID P4-1Q

MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185

60%

#416

GRID RTX6000-2Q

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500

50%

#417

GRID M60-0B

MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900

45%

#418

Quadro FX 4500 X2

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

40%

#419

Quadro FX 5500

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30

40%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 570M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 3000.

Insight	Radeon HD 3000	Quadro FX 570M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 570M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon HD 3000 Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 570M Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 3000 and Quadro FX 570M

Radeon HD 3000

The Radeon HD 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 96 points. Launch price was $180.

Quadro FX 570M

The Quadro FX 570M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 3000 scores 96 and the Quadro FX 570M reaches 99 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 3000 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Quadro FX 570M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 3000) vs 240 (Quadro FX 570M). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3000) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 570M).

Feature	Radeon HD 3000	Quadro FX 570M
G3D Mark Score	96	99+3%
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	1280+433%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.92 TFLOPS+209%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	80
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 3000	Quadro FX 570M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 3000) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 570M) — the Radeon HD 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 3000	Quadro FX 570M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 3000 draws 186W versus the Quadro FX 570M's 189W — a 1.6% difference. The Radeon HD 3000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3000) vs 350W (Quadro FX 570M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.