CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 3670
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 325M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 3670 is positioned at rank 320 and the GeForce GT 325M is on rank 274, so the GeForce GT 325M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3670
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 325M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 325M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 3670.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3670 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 3670 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 3670 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $20), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 32.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3670 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+32.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 3670 and GeForce GT 325M
Radeon HD 3670
The Radeon HD 3670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 169 points. Launch price was $369.
GeForce GT 325M
The GeForce GT 325M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 3670 scores 169 and the GeForce GT 325M reaches 170 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 3670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce GT 325M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 3670) vs 384 (GeForce GT 325M). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3670) vs 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 325M).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3670 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 169 | 170 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+300% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS+259% | 0.7526 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+200% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+500% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 3670 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 3670 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 325M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 325M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 3670) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 325M) — the Radeon HD 3670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3670 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 3670) vs 11 (10_1) (GeForce GT 325M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3670 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11 (10_1)+9% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (Radeon HD 3670) vs CUDA (GeForce GT 325M). Decoder: UVD vs PureVideo VP4.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3670 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | CUDA |
| Decoder | UVD | PureVideo VP4 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 3670 draws 250W versus the GeForce GT 325M's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce GT 325M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3670) vs 350W (GeForce GT 325M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3670 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 50W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 3.4+386% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 3670 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.3 (Radeon HD 3670) vs 8.5 (GeForce GT 325M) — the Radeon HD 3670 offers 32.9% better value. The GeForce GT 325M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3670 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-25% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.3+33% | 8.5 |
| Codename | Cayman | GK107 |
| Release | December 14 2010 | June 25 2013 |
| Ranking | #596 | #726 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 3670 and GeForce GT 325M
