Radeon HD 3670
VS
Mobility Radeon HD 530v

Radeon HD 3670 vs Mobility Radeon HD 530v

AMD

Radeon HD 3670

2010Boost: 880 MHz
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 530v

2010Core: 700 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 3670 is positioned at rank 320 and the Mobility Radeon HD 530v is on rank 554, so the Radeon HD 3670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3670

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
4292%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4124%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
4076%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4069%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4060%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
4037%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
3986%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3972%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3935%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
3924%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
3877%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3869%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
3799%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
3796%
#305
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
4734%
#320
Radeon HD 3670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
100%
#321
Radeon HD 3200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#322
Radeon HD 2350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $48
91%
#323
Radeon HD 2400
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
91%
#324
Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
89%
#326
GeForce 7300 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $20
82%
#327
Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $40
78%
#329
GeForce 7950 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
69%
#330
RADEON X550XT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $40
66%
#334
Radeon X1650 Pro
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
50%
#335
RADEON X550
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
50%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 530v

#544
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
3041%
#546
2757%
#547
2750%
#551
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2500%
#552
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2483%
#554
Mobility Radeon HD 530v
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
100%
#555
Mobility Radeon HD 565v
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
100%
#556
99%
#558
97%
#559
Radeon HD 8690A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#560
95%
#561
95%
#562
GeForce 9200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
94%
#563
94%
#564
Radeon R7 M265DX
MSRP: $149|Avg: $40
94%
#565
Radeon R9 M375
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
93%
#567
92%
#568
92%
#569
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Mobility Radeon HD 530v is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 3670.

InsightRadeon HD 3670Mobility Radeon HD 530v
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%)
Leading raw performance (+3.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Mobility Radeon HD 530v offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 530v holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $15), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 3.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 3670Mobility Radeon HD 530v
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+3.6%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 3670 and Mobility Radeon HD 530v

AMD

Radeon HD 3670

The Radeon HD 3670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 169 points. Launch price was $369.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 530v

The Mobility Radeon HD 530v is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 175 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 3670 scores 169 and the Mobility Radeon HD 530v reaches 175 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 3670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Mobility Radeon HD 530v uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 3670) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 530v). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3670) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 530v).

FeatureRadeon HD 3670Mobility Radeon HD 530v
G3D Mark Score
169
175+4%
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1536+92%
800
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.703 TFLOPS+141%
1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
96+140%
40
L1 Cache
192 KB+140%
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 3670Mobility Radeon HD 530v
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 3670 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 530v has 1 GB. The Mobility Radeon HD 530v offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 3670) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 530v) — the Radeon HD 3670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 3670Mobility Radeon HD 530v
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 3670) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 530v). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 3670Mobility Radeon HD 530v
DirectX
10.1
10.1
Max Displays
0
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 3670 draws 250W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 530v's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 530v is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3670) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 530v). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 3670Mobility Radeon HD 530v
TDP
250W
50W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
0.7
3.5+400%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 3670 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Mobility Radeon HD 530v launched at $49 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.3 (Radeon HD 3670) vs 11.7 (Mobility Radeon HD 530v) — the Mobility Radeon HD 530v offers 3.5% better value.

FeatureRadeon HD 3670Mobility Radeon HD 530v
MSRP
$100
$49-51%
Avg Price (30d)
$15
$15
Performance per Dollar
11.3
11.7+4%
Codename
Cayman
Broadway
Release
December 14 2010
January 7 2010
Ranking
#596
#846