Radeon HD 3670 vs Radeon HD 4350

AMD

Radeon HD 3670

2010Boost: 880 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 4350

2008Core: 625 MHz

Radeon HD 3670 vs Radeon HD 4350 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 3670 vs Radeon HD 4350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 3670 vs Radeon HD 4350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 3670

2010

Why buy it

  • 10.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 185.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 4.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
  • 127.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 110W.

Radeon HD 4350

2008

Why buy it

  • Costs $65 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 179% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.7 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 110W instead of 250W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 3670 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 3670 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (169 vs 165), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 3670 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 40nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 4350 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $65 cheaper on MSRP at $35 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 179% (4.7 vs 1.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4350 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 3670 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 3670 vs Radeon HD 4350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 3670

The Radeon HD 3670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 169 points. Launch price was $369.

AMD

Radeon HD 4350

The Radeon HD 4350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 165 points. Launch price was $199.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 3670 scores 169 and the Radeon HD 4350 reaches 165 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 3670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon HD 4350 uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 3670) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4350). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3670) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4350).

FeatureRadeon HD 3670Radeon HD 4350
G3D Mark Score
169+2%
165
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TeraScale
Process Node
40 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
1536+92%
800
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.703 TFLOPS+170%
1 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
96+140%
40
L1 Cache
192 KB+20%
160 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 3670Radeon HD 4350
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 3670 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4350 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 4350 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3670 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4350. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 3670) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 4350) — the Radeon HD 3670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 3670Radeon HD 4350
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 3670) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4350). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon HD 3670Radeon HD 4350
DirectX
10.1
10.1
Max Displays
0
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: UVD vs UVD 2.2.

FeatureRadeon HD 3670Radeon HD 4350
Encoder
UVD
Decoder
UVD
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 3670 draws 250W versus the Radeon HD 4350's 110W — a 77.8% difference. The Radeon HD 4350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3670) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4350). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon HD 3670Radeon HD 4350
TDP
250W
110W-56%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
72°C
Perf/Watt
0.7
1.5+114%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 3670 came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 4350 launched at $35. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4350 was 65% cheaper ($65 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (Radeon HD 3670) vs 4.7 (Radeon HD 4350) — the Radeon HD 4350 offers 176.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 3670 (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon HD 3670Radeon HD 4350
MSRP
$100
$35-65%
Performance per Dollar
1.7
4.7+176%
Codename
Cayman
RV770
Release
December 14 2010
June 25 2008
Ranking
#596
#876

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.