Radeon HD 3670 vs Radeon HD 7350

AMD

Radeon HD 3670

2010Boost: 880 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7350

2012Boost: 1250 MHz

Radeon HD 3670 vs Radeon HD 7350 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 3670 vs Radeon HD 7350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 3670 vs Radeon HD 7350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 3670

2010

Why buy it

  • βœ…Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    150% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$40 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).
  • ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.

Radeon HD 7350

2012

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $60 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 144.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($40 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 3670 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (169 vs 165), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 3670 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7350 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $60 cheaper on MSRP at $40 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 144.1% (4.1 vs 1.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7350 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 3670 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 3670 vs Radeon HD 7350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 3670

The Radeon HD 3670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 169 points. Launch price was $369.

AMD

Radeon HD 7350

The Radeon HD 7350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 165 points. Launch price was $449.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 3670 scores 169 and the Radeon HD 7350 reaches 165 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 3670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon HD 7350 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 3670) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7350). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3670) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7350). Boost clocks: 880 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 3670Radeon HD 7350
G3D Mark Score
169+2%
165
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536
1792+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.703 TFLOPS
2.867 TFLOPS+6%
Boost Clock
880 MHz
1250 MHz+42%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
96
112+17%
L1 Cache
192 KB
448 KB+133%
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 3670Radeon HD 7350
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3670 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7350. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 3670) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7350) β€” the Radeon HD 7350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 3670Radeon HD 7350
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 3670 draws 250W versus the Radeon HD 7350's 200W β€” a 22.2% difference. The Radeon HD 7350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3670) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7350). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon HD 3670Radeon HD 7350
TDP
250W
200W-20%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
β€”
Slots
0
β€”
Perf/Watt
0.7
0.8+14%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 3670 came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 7350 launched at $40. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7350 was 60% cheaper ($60 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (Radeon HD 3670) vs 4.1 (Radeon HD 7350) β€” the Radeon HD 7350 offers 141.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 7350 (2012 vs 2010).

FeatureRadeon HD 3670Radeon HD 7350
MSRP
$100
$40-60%
Performance per Dollar
1.7
4.1+141%
Codename
Cayman
Tahiti
Release
December 14 2010
January 31 2012
Ranking
#596
#454

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.