Radeon HD 3850 X2 vs Radeon R9 M280X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 3850 X2 vs Radeon R9 M280X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 3850 X2 vs Radeon R9 M280X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 3850 X2
2011Why buy it
- β Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than Radeon R9 M280X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- βLess VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β39.6% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M280X
2013Why buy it
- β 21.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Costs $99 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- β Delivers 38.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.3 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- β 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- β Draws 200W instead of 254W, a 54W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 3850 X2 vs Radeon R9 M280X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 3850 X2
The Radeon HD 3850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 960 Γ2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 254W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 822 points.

Radeon R9 M280X
The Radeon R9 M280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 814 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 3850 X2 scores 822 and the Radeon R9 M280X reaches 814 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 3850 X2 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R9 M280X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 960 (Radeon HD 3850 X2) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M280X). Raw compute: 1.536 TFLOPS Γ2 (Radeon HD 3850 X2) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M280X).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 X2 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 822 | 814 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 960 Γ2 | 2048+113% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.536 TFLOPS Γ2 | 4.096 TFLOPS+167% |
| ROPs | 32 Γ2 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 Γ2 | 128+167% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 512 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 X2 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 3850 X2 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M280X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M280X gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3850 X2 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M280X. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 3850 X2) vs 768 KB (Radeon R9 M280X) β the Radeon R9 M280X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 X2 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 3850 X2 draws 254W versus the Radeon R9 M280X's 200W β a 23.8% difference. The Radeon R9 M280X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 3850 X2) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M280X). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 X2 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 254W | 200W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 90Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2 | 4.1+28% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 3850 X2 came in at $349, while the Radeon R9 M280X launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M280X was 28.4% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (Radeon HD 3850 X2) vs 3.3 (Radeon R9 M280X) β the Radeon R9 M280X offers 37.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M280X (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 X2 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $250-28% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.4 | 3.3+38% |
| Codename | Barts | Tahiti |
| Release | September 19 2011 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #630 | #404 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















