Radeon HD 4670 vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Radeon HD 4670
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 4670 is positioned at rank #208 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4670
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is significantly newer (2022 vs 2010). The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4670 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3013.1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (8 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4670.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4670 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3013.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3013.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $150 (vs $67), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1290.5% better value per dollar than the Radeon HD 4670.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4670 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1290.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($67) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4670 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Radeon HD 4670
The Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $369.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 4670 scores 382 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 3013.1%. The Radeon HD 4670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 4670) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4670) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 880 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 382 | 11,892+3013% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2560+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+232% |
| Boost Clock | 880 MHz | 1755 MHz+99% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+20% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 2.5 MB+1216% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 4670 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 4670) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 8 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 4670) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12.2+21% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 4670) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4670 draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 63.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon HD 4670) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 193mm vs 235mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 130W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 193mm | 235mm |
| Height | — | 124mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-13% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.5 | 91.5+6000% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 4670 launched at $67 MSRP and currently averages $67, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The Radeon HD 4670 costs 55.3% less ($83 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.7 (Radeon HD 4670) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 1291.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $67-73% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $67-55% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.7 | 79.3+1291% |
| Codename | Cayman | GA106 |
| Release | December 14 2010 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #596 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 4670 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
