Radeon HD 4830 vs Radeon R5 430

AMD

Radeon HD 4830

2008Core: 575 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 430

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 4830 vs Radeon R5 430 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 4830 vs Radeon R5 430 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 4830 vs Radeon R5 430: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 4830

2008

Why buy it

  • 6.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 120.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $130 MSRPvs$59 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
  • 216.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 30W.
  • 46.4% longer card at 246mm vs 168mm.

Radeon R5 430

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $71 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
  • Delivers 125.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 95W, a 65W reduction.
  • Measures 168mm instead of 246mm, a 78mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4830 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 4830 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 430 instead at 886 vs 866, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 4830 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 430 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $71 cheaper on MSRP at $59 vs $130, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 125.4% (15.0 vs 6.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 430 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 4830 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 4830 vs Radeon R5 430 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 4830

The Radeon HD 4830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 866 points. Launch price was $130.

AMD

Radeon R5 430

The Radeon R5 430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 886 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 4830 scores 866 and the Radeon R5 430 reaches 886 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4830 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon R5 430 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 4830) vs 320 (Radeon R5 430). Raw compute: 0.736 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4830) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 430).

FeatureRadeon HD 4830Radeon R5 430
G3D Mark Score
866
886+2%
Architecture
TeraScale
GCN 1.0
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640+100%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.736 TFLOPS+12%
0.6592 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+60%
20
L1 Cache
128 KB+60%
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 4830Radeon R5 430
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 4830 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 430 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 4830 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4830 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 430. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 4830) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 430) — the Radeon HD 4830 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 4830Radeon R5 430
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 4830) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R5 430). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 4830Radeon R5 430
DirectX
10.1
12 (11_1)+19%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (Radeon HD 4830) vs None (Radeon R5 430). Decoder: UVD 2 vs UVD 4.0.

FeatureRadeon HD 4830Radeon R5 430
Encoder
UVD 2
None
Decoder
UVD 2
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 4830 draws 95W versus the Radeon R5 430's 30W — a 104% difference. The Radeon R5 430 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 4830) vs 350W (Radeon R5 430). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 246mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureRadeon HD 4830Radeon R5 430
TDP
95W
30W-68%
Recommended PSU
450W
350W-22%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
246mm
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
9.1
29.5+224%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 4830 came in at $130, while the Radeon R5 430 launched at $59. On MSRP, Radeon R5 430 was 54.6% cheaper ($71 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.7 (Radeon HD 4830) vs 15.0 (Radeon R5 430) — the Radeon R5 430 offers 123.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 430 (2016 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon HD 4830Radeon R5 430
MSRP
$130
$59-55%
Performance per Dollar
6.7
15.0+124%
Codename
RV770
Jet
Release
October 21 2008
May 15 2016
Ranking
#920
#922

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.