Radeon HD 4830 vs Radeon R5 430
Radeon HD 4830
Popular choices:
Radeon R5 430
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 4830 is positioned at rank 187 and the Radeon R5 430 is on rank 303, so the Radeon HD 4830 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4830
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 430
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R5 430 is significantly newer (2016 vs 2008). The Radeon R5 430 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4830 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 430 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 4830 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4830 | Radeon R5 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (246mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 4830 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 4830 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $50), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 144.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4830 | Radeon R5 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+144.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4830 and Radeon R5 430
Radeon HD 4830
The Radeon HD 4830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 866 points. Launch price was $130.
Radeon R5 430
The Radeon R5 430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 886 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 4830 scores 866 and the Radeon R5 430 reaches 886 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4830 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon R5 430 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 4830) vs 320 (Radeon R5 430). Raw compute: 0.736 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4830) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 430).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4830 | Radeon R5 430 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 866 | 886+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+100% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.736 TFLOPS+12% | 0.6592 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+60% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+60% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4830 | Radeon R5 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 4830 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 430 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 4830 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 4830) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 430) — the Radeon HD 4830 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4830 | Radeon R5 430 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 4830) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R5 430). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4830 | Radeon R5 430 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 (11_1)+19% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (Radeon HD 4830) vs None (Radeon R5 430). Decoder: UVD 2 vs UVD 4.0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4830 | Radeon R5 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4830 draws 95W versus the Radeon R5 430's 30W — a 104% difference. The Radeon R5 430 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 4830) vs 350W (Radeon R5 430). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 246mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4830 | Radeon R5 430 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W | 30W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 246mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 9.1 | 29.5+224% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 4830 launched at $130 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon R5 430 launched at $59 and now averages $50. The Radeon HD 4830 costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 43.3 (Radeon HD 4830) vs 17.7 (Radeon R5 430) — the Radeon HD 4830 offers 144.6% better value. The Radeon R5 430 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4830 | Radeon R5 430 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $130 | $59-55% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-60% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.3+145% | 17.7 |
| Codename | RV770 | Jet |
| Release | October 21 2008 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #920 | #922 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 4830 and Radeon R5 430
