
Radeon HD 4890 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Radeon HD 4890
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4890.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4890 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 550 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $25), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4890 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4890 and GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Radeon HD 4890
The Radeon HD 4890 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,546 points. Launch price was $249.

GeForce GTX 550 Ti
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,558 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 4890 scores 1,546 and the GeForce GTX 550 Ti reaches 1,558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4890 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce GTX 550 Ti uses Fermi 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4890) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4890) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 550 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4890 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,546 | 1,558 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+317% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.36 TFLOPS+97% | 0.6912 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 256 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4890 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 4890 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 550 Ti has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 550 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 4890) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 550 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4890 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 3 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon HD 4890) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4890 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4890 draws 190W versus the GeForce GTX 550 Ti's 116W — a 48.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 4890) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 550 Ti). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4890 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 116W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 8.1 | 13.4+65% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 4890 launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce GTX 550 Ti launched at $149 and now averages $25. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 61.8 (Radeon HD 4890) vs 62.3 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 550 Ti offers 0.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4890 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $149-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.8 | 62.3 |
| Codename | RV790 | GF116 |
| Release | April 2 2009 | March 15 2011 |
| Ranking | #762 | #761 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















