Radeon HD 4890
VS
GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Radeon HD 4890 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti

AMD

Radeon HD 4890

2009Core: 850 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 550 Ti

2011Core: 900 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4890.

InsightRadeon HD 4890GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 550 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 550 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $25), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 4890GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+0.8%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4890 and GeForce GTX 550 Ti

AMD

Radeon HD 4890

The Radeon HD 4890 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,546 points. Launch price was $249.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 550 Ti

The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,558 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 4890 scores 1,546 and the GeForce GTX 550 Ti reaches 1,558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4890 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce GTX 550 Ti uses Fermi 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4890) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4890) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 550 Ti).

FeatureRadeon HD 4890GeForce GTX 550 Ti
G3D Mark Score
1,546
1,558
Architecture
TeraScale
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
800+317%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.36 TFLOPS+97%
0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
24+50%
TMUs
40+25%
32
L1 Cache
160 KB
256 KB+60%
L2 Cache
256 KB
384 KB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 4890GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 4890 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 550 Ti has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 550 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 4890) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 550 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 4890GeForce GTX 550 Ti
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
3 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
384 KB+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon HD 4890) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti).

FeatureRadeon HD 4890GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Codecs
H.264
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 4890 draws 190W versus the GeForce GTX 550 Ti's 116W — a 48.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 4890) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 550 Ti). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon HD 4890GeForce GTX 550 Ti
TDP
190W
116W-39%
Recommended PSU
500W
400W-20%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt
8.1
13.4+65%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 4890 launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce GTX 550 Ti launched at $149 and now averages $25. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 61.8 (Radeon HD 4890) vs 62.3 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 550 Ti offers 0.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2009).

FeatureRadeon HD 4890GeForce GTX 550 Ti
MSRP
$249
$149-40%
Avg Price (30d)
$25
$25
Performance per Dollar
61.8
62.3
Codename
RV790
GF116
Release
April 2 2009
March 15 2011
Ranking
#762
#761