
Radeon HD 4890 vs Quadro K2000

Radeon HD 4890
Popular choices:

Quadro K2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4890.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4890 | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 4890 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 4890 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $500), it costs 95% less, resulting in a 1854.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4890 | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1854.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4890 and Quadro K2000

Radeon HD 4890
The Radeon HD 4890 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,546 points. Launch price was $249.

Quadro K2000
The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 4890 scores 1,546 and the Quadro K2000 reaches 1,582 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4890 is built on TeraScale while the Quadro K2000 uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4890) vs 384 (Quadro K2000). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4890) vs 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4890 | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,546 | 1,582+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.36 TFLOPS+86% | 0.7327 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+400% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4890 | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4890 | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon HD 4890) vs H.264 (Quadro K2000).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4890 | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | — | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4890 draws 190W versus the Quadro K2000's 51W — a 115.4% difference. The Quadro K2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 4890) vs 350W (Quadro K2000). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4890 | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 51W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 202mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 8.1 | 31.0+283% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 4890 launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Quadro K2000 launched at $599 and now averages $500. The Radeon HD 4890 costs 95% less ($475 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 61.8 (Radeon HD 4890) vs 3.2 (Quadro K2000) — the Radeon HD 4890 offers 1831.2% better value. The Quadro K2000 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4890 | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-58% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-95% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.8+1831% | 3.2 |
| Codename | RV790 | GK107 |
| Release | April 2 2009 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #762 | #756 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












