
Radeon HD 4890

Radeon HD 6790
Radeon HD 4890 vs Radeon HD 6790 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 4890 vs Radeon HD 6790 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 4890 vs Radeon HD 6790: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 4890
2009Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6790 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌67.1% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 10.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌26.7% higher power demand at 190W vs 150W.
Radeon HD 6790
2011Why buy it
- ✅30.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 69.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 190W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 4890 vs Radeon HD 6790 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 4890
The Radeon HD 4890 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,546 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon HD 6790
The Radeon HD 6790 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 840 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,567 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 4890 scores 1,546 and the Radeon HD 6790 reaches 1,567 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4890 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon HD 6790 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4890) vs 800 (Radeon HD 6790). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4890) vs 1.344 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6790).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4890 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,546 | 1,567+1% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.36 TFLOPS+1% | 1.344 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4890 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 4890 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6790 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 4890 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4890 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6790. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 4890) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6790) — the Radeon HD 6790 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4890 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon HD 4890) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 6790).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4890 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | None |
| Decoder | — | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4890 draws 190W versus the Radeon HD 6790's 150W — a 23.5% difference. The Radeon HD 6790 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 4890) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6790). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4890 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 150W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 8.1 | 10.4+28% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 4890 came in at $249, while the Radeon HD 6790 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6790 was 40.2% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.2 (Radeon HD 4890) vs 10.5 (Radeon HD 6790) — the Radeon HD 6790 offers 69.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 6790 (2011 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4890 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $149-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.2 | 10.5+69% |
| Codename | RV790 | Barts |
| Release | April 2 2009 | April 4 2011 |
| Ranking | #762 | #759 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















