Quadro K2000 vs Radeon HD 4890

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K2000 vs Radeon HD 4890 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K2000 vs Radeon HD 4890: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K2000

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 51W instead of 190W, a 139W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4890 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
140.6% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Radeon HD 4890

2009

Why buy it

✅28.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 135.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌272.5% higher power demand at 190W vs 51W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 4890 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 28.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K2000 instead at 1,582 vs 1,546, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K2000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2009. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 4890 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $350 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 135.1% (6.2 vs 2.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4890 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K2000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K2000 vs Radeon HD 4890 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K2000

The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon HD 4890

The Radeon HD 4890 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,546 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2000 scores 1,582 and the Radeon HD 4890 reaches 1,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 4890 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4890). Raw compute: 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4890).

Feature	Quadro K2000	Radeon HD 4890
G3D Mark Score	1,582+2%	1,546
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384	800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7327 TFLOPS	1.36 TFLOPS+86%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	32 KB	160 KB+400%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K2000	Radeon HD 4890
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K2000 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4890.

Feature	Quadro K2000	Radeon HD 4890
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264 (Quadro K2000) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 4890).

Feature	Quadro K2000	Radeon HD 4890
Encoder	NVENC 1st gen	—
Decoder	NVDEC 1st gen	—
Codecs	H.264	H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2000 draws 51W versus the Radeon HD 4890's 190W — a 115.4% difference. The Quadro K2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000) vs 500W (Radeon HD 4890). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro K2000	Radeon HD 4890
TDP	51W-73%	190W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	202mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	31.0+283%	8.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K2000 came in at $599, while the Radeon HD 4890 launched at $249. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4890 was 58.4% cheaper ($350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (Quadro K2000) vs 6.2 (Radeon HD 4890) — the Radeon HD 4890 offers 138.5% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K2000 (2013 vs 2009).

Feature	Quadro K2000	Radeon HD 4890
MSRP	$599	$249-58%
Performance per Dollar	2.6	6.2+138%
Codename	GK107	RV790
Release	March 1 2013	April 2 2009
Ranking	#756	#762

Search Quadro K2000 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4890 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.