Radeon 630 vs Radeon HD 4890

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 630 vs Radeon HD 4890 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 630 vs Radeon HD 4890: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 630

2019

Why buy it

✅18.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 153.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Radeon HD 4890 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 630 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 190W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon HD 4890

2009

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 630 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
149% HIGHER MSRP
$249 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 15.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌280% higher power demand at 190W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 630 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (1,575 vs 1,546), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 630 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2009. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 630 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $149 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 153.7% (15.8 vs 6.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon 630 vs Radeon HD 4890 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 630

The Radeon 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.

Radeon HD 4890

The Radeon HD 4890 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,546 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 630 scores 1,575 and the Radeon HD 4890 reaches 1,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 630 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon HD 4890 uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 630) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4890). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 630) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4890).

Feature	Radeon 630	Radeon HD 4890
G3D Mark Score	1,575+2%	1,546
Architecture	GCN 4.0	TeraScale
Process Node	14 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	512	800+56%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.247 TFLOPS	1.36 TFLOPS+9%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	128 KB	160 KB+25%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 630	Radeon HD 4890
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 630 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4890 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 4890 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon 630 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4890. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon 630) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 4890) — the Radeon 630 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon 630	Radeon HD 4890
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 630 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 4890's 190W — a 116.7% difference. The Radeon 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 630) vs 500W (Radeon HD 4890). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon 630	Radeon HD 4890
TDP	50W-74%	190W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	31.5+289%	8.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 630 came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 4890 launched at $249. On MSRP, Radeon 630 was 59.8% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.8 (Radeon 630) vs 6.2 (Radeon HD 4890) — the Radeon 630 offers 154.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 630 (2019 vs 2009).

Feature	Radeon 630	Radeon HD 4890
MSRP	$100-60%	$249
Performance per Dollar	15.8+155%	6.2
Codename	Polaris 23	RV790
Release	May 13 2019	April 2 2009
Ranking	#757	#762

Search Radeon 630 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4890 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.