
Radeon 630
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega11
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 630 is positioned at rank #292 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 630
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega11 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon 630 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 630 | Radeon RX Vega11 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX Vega11 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $50 for the Radeon 630, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 27.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 630 | Radeon RX Vega11 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+27.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 630 and Radeon RX Vega11

Radeon 630
The Radeon 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.

Radeon RX Vega11
The Radeon RX Vega11 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,605 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 630 scores 1,575 and the Radeon RX Vega11 reaches 1,605 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 630 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX Vega11 uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 630) vs 704 (Radeon RX Vega11). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 630) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega11). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 1251 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 630 | Radeon RX Vega11 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,575 | 1,605+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 704+38% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS | 1.761 TFLOPS+41% |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | 1251 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32 | 44+38% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 630 | Radeon RX Vega11 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 630 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega11 has 0 MB. The Radeon 630 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 630 | Radeon RX Vega11 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 630 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX Vega11's 35W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega11 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 630) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega11). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon 630 | Radeon RX Vega11 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 35W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 31.5 | 45.9+46% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 630 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon RX Vega11 launched at $150 and now averages $40. The Radeon RX Vega11 costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.5 (Radeon 630) vs 40.1 (Radeon RX Vega11) — the Radeon RX Vega11 offers 27.3% better value. The Radeon 630 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon 630 | Radeon RX Vega11 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-33% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $40-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.5 | 40.1+27% |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Raven |
| Release | May 13 2019 | May 10 2018 |
| Ranking | #757 | #673 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















