
GeForce GTX 555
Popular choices:

Radeon 630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 555
2011Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 630 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌50% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 15.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
Radeon 630
2019Why buy it
- ✅31.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 47.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 10.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 555: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 555 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX 555
2011Radeon 630
2019Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅31.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 47.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 10.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 555: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 555 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 630 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌50% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 15.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 630 better than GeForce GTX 555?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 555 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 17 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 18 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 555 and Radeon 630

GeForce GTX 555
GeForce GTX 555
The GeForce GTX 555 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,604 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon 630
Radeon 630
The Radeon 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 555 scores 1,604 and the Radeon 630 reaches 1,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 555 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon 630 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GTX 555) vs 512 (Radeon 630). Raw compute: 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 555) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 630).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,604+2% | 1,575 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 144 | 512+256% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4147 TFLOPS | 1.247 TFLOPS+201% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 555 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 630 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 555 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 630 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 555 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 555) vs 512 KB (Radeon 630) — the Radeon 630 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 555 draws 70W versus the Radeon 630's 50W — a 33.3% difference. The Radeon 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 555) vs 350W (Radeon 630). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 50W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 210mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.9 | 31.5+38% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 555 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Radeon 630 launched at $100. The Radeon 630 costs 33.3% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.7 (GeForce GTX 555) vs 15.8 (Radeon 630) — the Radeon 630 offers 47.7% better value. The Radeon 630 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $100-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.7 | 15.8+48% |
| Codename | GF116 | Polaris 23 |
| Release | May 14 2011 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #849 | #757 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












