Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Radeon 630

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 630

#61

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

MSRP: $800|Avg: $350

98%

#62

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350

95%

#282

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

689%

#284

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

625%

#285

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

623%

#289

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

567%

#290

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

563%

#292

Radeon 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

100%

#293

GeForce MX330

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

99%

#297

Radeon RX 780

MSRP: $499|Avg: $721

97%

#300

GeForce 940MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

96%

#301

GeForce MX130

MSRP: $120|Avg: $50

95%

#302

Arc Graphics 130V

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

95%

#303

Radeon R5 430

MSRP: $59|Avg: $50

95%

#305

GeForce MX150

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

95%

#307

GeForce MX450

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 630 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon 630 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Radeon 630
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015))	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $50 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 0.4% better value per dollar than the Radeon 630.

Insight	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Radeon 630
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+0.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 Benchmark Check

Radeon 630 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and Radeon 630

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.

Radeon 630

The Radeon 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 scores 1,582 and the Radeon 630 reaches 1,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon 630 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 512 (Radeon 630). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 630). Boost clocks: 800 MHz vs 1218 MHz.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Radeon 630
G3D Mark Score	1,582	1,575
Architecture	Generation 8.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6144 TFLOPS	1.247 TFLOPS+103%
Boost Clock	800 MHz	1218 MHz+52%
ROPs	6	16+167%
TMUs	48+50%	32

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Radeon 630
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 630 has 512 MB. The Radeon 630 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Radeon 630
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 draws 15W versus the Radeon 630's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 350W (Radeon 630). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Radeon 630
TDP	15W-70%	50W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	105.5+235%	31.5

💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon 630 launched at $100 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.6 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 31.5 (Radeon 630) — the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 offers 0.3% better value. The Radeon 630 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).