Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Quadro K2000D

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Quadro K2000D Performance Spectrum

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Shared System RAM 15

1,582

0.0%

1,600

+1.1%

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

TITAN V

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Quadro K2000D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Quadro K2000D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $449 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 294.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 51W, a 36W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K2000D

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro K2000D is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
299.3% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 10.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌240% higher power demand at 51W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K2000D is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (1,600 vs 1,582), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K2000D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $449 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 294.8% (10.5 vs 2.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K2000D has the stronger long-term case.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Quadro K2000D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.

Quadro K2000D

The Quadro K2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 scores 1,582 and the Quadro K2000D reaches 1,600 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Quadro K2000D uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 384 (Quadro K2000D). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000D).

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Quadro K2000D
G3D Mark Score	1,582	1,600+1%
Architecture	Generation 8.0	Kepler
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6144 TFLOPS	0.7327 TFLOPS+19%
ROPs	6	16+167%
TMUs	48+50%	32

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Quadro K2000D
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2000D carries 2 GB. Quadro K2000D gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and 64-bit on the Quadro K2000D.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Quadro K2000D
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000D). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Quadro K2000D
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.1	1.2+9%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 draws 15W versus the Quadro K2000D's 51W — a 109.1% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 350W (Quadro K2000D). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Quadro K2000D
TDP	15W-71%	51W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	—	202mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80
Perf/Watt	105.5+236%	31.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 came in at $150, while the Quadro K2000D launched at $599. On MSRP, Iris Pro Graphics P6300 was 75% cheaper ($449 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.5 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 2.7 (Quadro K2000D) — the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 offers 288.9% better value. The newer card here is Iris Pro Graphics P6300 (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Quadro K2000D
MSRP	$150-75%	$599
Performance per Dollar	10.5+289%	2.7
Codename	Broadwell GT3e	GK107
Release	September 5 2014	March 1 2013
Ranking	#755	#750

Search Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on Amazon

Search Quadro K2000D on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.