Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Quadro K2000D
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Popular choices:
Quadro K2000D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K2000D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics P6300.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K2000D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K2000D holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $50), it costs 30% less, resulting in a 44.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+44.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and Quadro K2000D
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.
Quadro K2000D
The Quadro K2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 scores 1,582 and the Quadro K2000D reaches 1,600 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Quadro K2000D uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 384 (Quadro K2000D). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000D).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,582 | 1,600+1% |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6144 TFLOPS | 0.7327 TFLOPS+19% |
| ROPs | 6 | 16+167% |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2000D has 2 GB. The Quadro K2000D offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000D). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 draws 15W versus the Quadro K2000D's 51W — a 109.1% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 350W (Quadro K2000D). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-71% | 51W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 202mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 105.5+236% | 31.4 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Quadro K2000D launched at $599 and now averages $35. The Quadro K2000D costs 30% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.6 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 45.7 (Quadro K2000D) — the Quadro K2000D offers 44.6% better value. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-75% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $35-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.6 | 45.7+45% |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3e | GK107 |
| Release | September 5 2014 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #755 | #750 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and Quadro K2000D
