Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

2014Core: 300 MHzBoost: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

2020Boost: 2100 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

2014

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

2020

Why buy it

  • Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: Vega (2017−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (1,595 vs 1,582), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 14nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $150 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.8% (10.6 vs 10.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

The Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2020. It features the Vega architecture. The boost clock speed is 2100 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,595 points.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 scores 1,582 and the Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H reaches 1,595 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H uses Vega, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 512 (Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H). Boost clocks: 800 MHz vs 2100 MHz.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics P6300Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H
G3D Mark Score
1,582
1,595
Architecture
Generation 8.0
Vega
Process Node
14 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Boost Clock
800 MHz
2100 MHz+163%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Pro Graphics P6300Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics P6300Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 draws 15W versus the Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H's 15W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics P6300Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H
TDP
15W
15W
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
105.5
106.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 came in at $150, while the Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H launched at $150. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.5 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 10.6 (Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H) — the Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H offers 1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H (2020 vs 2014).

FeatureIris Pro Graphics P6300Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H
MSRP
$150
$150
Performance per Dollar
10.5
10.6
Codename
Broadwell GT3e
Vega
Release
September 5 2014
January 7 2020
Ranking
#755
#545

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.