Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Radeon RX Vega11

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

2014Core: 300 MHzBoost: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega11

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1251 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Radeon RX Vega11 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Radeon RX Vega11: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon RX Vega11

2018

Why buy it

  • Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX Vega11 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX Vega11 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (1,605 vs 1,582), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX Vega11 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX Vega11 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $150 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1.5% (10.7 vs 10.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Radeon RX Vega11 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega11

The Radeon RX Vega11 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,605 points.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 scores 1,582 and the Radeon RX Vega11 reaches 1,605 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon RX Vega11 uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 704 (Radeon RX Vega11). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega11). Boost clocks: 800 MHz vs 1251 MHz.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics P6300Radeon RX Vega11
G3D Mark Score
1,582
1,605+1%
Architecture
Generation 8.0
GCN 5.0
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
704+83%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6144 TFLOPS
1.761 TFLOPS+187%
Boost Clock
800 MHz
1251 MHz+56%
ROPs
6
8+33%
TMUs
48+9%
44

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Pro Graphics P6300Radeon RX Vega11
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX Vega11.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics P6300Radeon RX Vega11
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 draws 15W versus the Radeon RX Vega11's 35W — a 80% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega11). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics P6300Radeon RX Vega11
TDP
15W-57%
35W
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
105.5+130%
45.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 came in at $150, while the Radeon RX Vega11 launched at $150. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.5 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 10.7 (Radeon RX Vega11) — the Radeon RX Vega11 offers 1.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega11 (2018 vs 2014).

FeatureIris Pro Graphics P6300Radeon RX Vega11
MSRP
$150
$150
Performance per Dollar
10.5
10.7+2%
Codename
Broadwell GT3e
Raven
Release
September 5 2014
May 10 2018
Ranking
#755
#673

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.