Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Radeon RX Vega11

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX Vega11 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega11 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX Vega11 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics P6300.

Insight	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Radeon RX Vega11
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX Vega11 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $50 for the Iris Pro Graphics P6300, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 26.8% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Radeon RX Vega11
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+26.8%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)	✅More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX Vega11 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and Radeon RX Vega11

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.

Radeon RX Vega11

The Radeon RX Vega11 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,605 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 scores 1,582 and the Radeon RX Vega11 reaches 1,605 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon RX Vega11 uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 704 (Radeon RX Vega11). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega11). Boost clocks: 800 MHz vs 1251 MHz.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Radeon RX Vega11
G3D Mark Score	1,582	1,605+1%
Architecture	Generation 8.0	GCN 5.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	704+83%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6144 TFLOPS	1.761 TFLOPS+187%
Boost Clock	800 MHz	1251 MHz+56%
ROPs	6	8+33%
TMUs	48+9%	44

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Radeon RX Vega11
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 0 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Radeon RX Vega11
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 draws 15W versus the Radeon RX Vega11's 35W — a 80% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega11). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Radeon RX Vega11
TDP	15W-57%	35W
Recommended PSU	1W	1W
Power Connector	Integrated	Integrated
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	105.5+130%	45.9

💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon RX Vega11 launched at $150 and now averages $40. The Radeon RX Vega11 costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.6 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 40.1 (Radeon RX Vega11) — the Radeon RX Vega11 offers 26.9% better value. The Radeon RX Vega11 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).