Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Radeon R9 M370X
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 M370X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M370X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M370X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $100), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 101.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+101.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and Radeon R9 M370X
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.
Radeon R9 M370X
The Radeon R9 M370X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 19 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,570 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 scores 1,582 and the Radeon R9 M370X reaches 1,570 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon R9 M370X uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M370X).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,582 | 1,570 |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M370X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M370X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R9 M370X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (FL 11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 M370X's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M370X). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Mobile |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 105.5+405% | 20.9 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R9 M370X launched at $300 and now averages $100. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 costs 50% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.6 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 15.7 (Radeon R9 M370X) — the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 offers 101.3% better value. The Radeon R9 M370X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-50% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-50% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.6+101% | 15.7 |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3e | Cape Verde |
| Release | September 5 2014 | May 19 2015 |
| Ranking | #755 | #758 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and Radeon R9 M370X
