FirePro M4000 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300

FirePro M4000

2012Core: 675 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

2014Core: 300 MHzBoost: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro M4000 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M4000 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M4000

2012

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro M4000 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 120% higher power demand at 33W vs 15W.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 15W instead of 33W, a 18W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro M4000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (1,596 vs 1,582), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M4000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M4000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M4000 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M4000

The FirePro M4000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,596 points.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4000 scores 1,596 and the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 reaches 1,582 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 uses Generation 8.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M4000) vs 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4000) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P6300).

FeatureFirePro M4000Iris Pro Graphics P6300
G3D Mark Score
1,596
1,582
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Generation 8.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
512+33%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS+13%
0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+167%
6
TMUs
32
48+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M4000Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M4000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 carries 0 MB. FirePro M4000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4000 and System on the Iris Pro Graphics P6300.

FeatureFirePro M4000Iris Pro Graphics P6300
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4000) vs 12 (11_1) (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6.

FeatureFirePro M4000Iris Pro Graphics P6300
DirectX
12
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.2+9%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4000 draws 33W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P6300's 15W — a 75% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4000) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureFirePro M4000Iris Pro Graphics P6300
TDP
33W
15W-55%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
82mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
48.4
105.5+118%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M4000 came in at $0, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 launched at $150. On MSRP, FirePro M4000 was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro M4000) vs 10.5 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) — the FirePro M4000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Pro Graphics P6300 (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro M4000Iris Pro Graphics P6300
MSRP
$0-100%
$150
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
10.5
Codename
Chelsea
Broadwell GT3e
Release
June 27 2012
September 5 2014
Ranking
#752
#755

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.