
FirePro M4000

Iris Pro Graphics P6300
FirePro M4000 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M4000 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M4000 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M4000
2012Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro M4000 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌120% higher power demand at 33W vs 15W.
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 33W, a 18W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M4000 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M4000
The FirePro M4000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,596 points.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M4000 scores 1,596 and the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 reaches 1,582 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 uses Generation 8.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M4000) vs 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4000) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P6300).
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,596 | 1,582 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS+13% | 0.6144 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+167% | 6 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M4000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 carries 0 MB. FirePro M4000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4000 and System on the Iris Pro Graphics P6300.
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4000) vs 12 (11_1) (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6.
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M4000 draws 33W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P6300's 15W — a 75% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4000) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 15W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 82mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 48.4 | 105.5+118% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M4000 came in at $0, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 launched at $150. On MSRP, FirePro M4000 was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro M4000) vs 10.5 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) — the FirePro M4000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Pro Graphics P6300 (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 10.5 |
| Codename | Chelsea | Broadwell GT3e |
| Release | June 27 2012 | September 5 2014 |
| Ranking | #752 | #755 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















