FirePro M4000 vs GRID M10-2B

FirePro M4000

2012Core: 675 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

GRID M10-2B

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro M4000 vs GRID M10-2B Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M4000 vs GRID M10-2B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M4000

2012

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 33W instead of 225W, a 192W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

GRID M10-2B

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 581.8% higher power demand at 225W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID M10-2B is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3% in PassMark G3D (1,644 vs 1,596), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M4000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M10-2B makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID M10-2B is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M4000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M4000 vs GRID M10-2B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M4000

The FirePro M4000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,596 points.

NVIDIA

GRID M10-2B

The GRID M10-2B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,644 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4000 scores 1,596 and the GRID M10-2B reaches 1,644 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID M10-2B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M4000) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-2B). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4000) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2B).

FeatureFirePro M4000GRID M10-2B
G3D Mark Score
1,596
1,644+3%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
2048+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+598%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
32
128+300%
L1 Cache
128 KB
768 KB+500%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M4000GRID M10-2B
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M4000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-2B carries 512 MB. FirePro M4000 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4000 and 64-bit on the GRID M10-2B. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M4000) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-2B) — the GRID M10-2B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro M4000GRID M10-2B
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4000 draws 33W versus the GRID M10-2B's 225W — a 148.8% difference. The FirePro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4000) vs 350W (GRID M10-2B). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro M4000GRID M10-2B
TDP
33W-85%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
82mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
48.4+563%
7.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M4000 came in at $0, while the GRID M10-2B launched at $2500. On MSRP, FirePro M4000 was 100+% cheaper ($2500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro M4000) vs 0.7 (GRID M10-2B) — the FirePro M4000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-2B (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro M4000GRID M10-2B
MSRP
$0-100%
$2500
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.7
Codename
Chelsea
GM204
Release
June 27 2012
August 30 2015
Ranking
#752
#433

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.