FirePro M4000 vs Radeon HD 8870M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M4000 vs Radeon HD 8870M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro M4000 vs Radeon HD 8870M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M4000

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 8870M

2013

Why buy it

✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8870M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (1,638 vs 1,596), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro M4000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8870M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8870M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M4000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M4000 vs Radeon HD 8870M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M4000

The FirePro M4000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,596 points.

Radeon HD 8870M

The Radeon HD 8870M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,638 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4000 scores 1,596 and the Radeon HD 8870M reaches 1,638 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 8870M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M4000) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8870M). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4000) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8870M).

Feature	FirePro M4000	Radeon HD 8870M
G3D Mark Score	1,596	1,638+3%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512	640+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	0.992 TFLOPS+44%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	128 KB	160 KB+25%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro M4000	Radeon HD 8870M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4000 and System on the Radeon HD 8870M.

Feature	FirePro M4000	Radeon HD 8870M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4000) vs 11.1 (Radeon HD 8870M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	FirePro M4000	Radeon HD 8870M
DirectX	12+8%	11.1
Vulkan	1.2+9%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4000) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8870M). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (FirePro M4000) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MVC (Radeon HD 8870M).

Feature	FirePro M4000	Radeon HD 8870M
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCE 1.0
Decoder	UVD 4.0	UVD 3.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4000 draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 8870M's 50W — a 41% difference. The FirePro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4000) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8870M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.

Feature	FirePro M4000	Radeon HD 8870M
TDP	33W-34%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	82mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85
Perf/Watt	48.4+48%	32.8

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 8870M (2013 vs 2012).

Feature	FirePro M4000	Radeon HD 8870M
MSRP	$0	—
Codename	Chelsea	Venus
Release	June 27 2012	April 1 2013
Ranking	#752	#745

Search FirePro M4000 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8870M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.