
FirePro M4000 vs Seria Radeon HD 7700

FirePro M4000
Popular choices:

Seria Radeon HD 7700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Seria Radeon HD 7700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M4000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro M4000 | Seria Radeon HD 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Seria Radeon HD 7700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Seria Radeon HD 7700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $30), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M4000 | Seria Radeon HD 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M4000 and Seria Radeon HD 7700

FirePro M4000
The FirePro M4000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,596 points.

Seria Radeon HD 7700
The Seria Radeon HD 7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,604 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M4000 scores 1,596 and the Seria Radeon HD 7700 reaches 1,604 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Seria Radeon HD 7700 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M4000) vs 2,048 (Seria Radeon HD 7700). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4000) vs 3.789 TFLOPS (Seria Radeon HD 7700).
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Seria Radeon HD 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,596 | 1,604 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2048+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 3.789 TFLOPS+448% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Seria Radeon HD 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M4000 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Seria Radeon HD 7700 has 512 MB. The FirePro M4000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M4000) vs 768 KB (Seria Radeon HD 7700) — the Seria Radeon HD 7700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Seria Radeon HD 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M4000 draws 33W versus the Seria Radeon HD 7700's 250W — a 153.4% difference. The FirePro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4000) vs 450W (Seria Radeon HD 7700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Seria Radeon HD 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-87% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 82mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 48.4+656% | 6.4 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M4000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Seria Radeon HD 7700 launched at $159 and now averages $30. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.2 (FirePro M4000) vs 53.5 (Seria Radeon HD 7700) — the Seria Radeon HD 7700 offers 0.6% better value.
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Seria Radeon HD 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $159 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.2 | 53.5 |
| Codename | Chelsea | Tahiti |
| Release | June 27 2012 | January 9 2012 |
| Ranking | #752 | #431 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















