
FirePro M4000

Radeon RX Vega11
FirePro M4000 vs Radeon RX Vega11 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M4000 vs Radeon RX Vega11 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M4000 vs Radeon RX Vega11: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M4000
2012Why buy it
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- β Radeon RX Vega11 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro M4000 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- β2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Radeon RX Vega11
2018Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017β2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M4000 vs Radeon RX Vega11 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M4000
The FirePro M4000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,596 points.

Radeon RX Vega11
The Radeon RX Vega11 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,605 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M4000 scores 1,596 and the Radeon RX Vega11 reaches 1,605 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX Vega11 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M4000) vs 704 (Radeon RX Vega11). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4000) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega11).
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Radeon RX Vega11 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,596 | 1,605 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 704+38% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 1.761 TFLOPS+155% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32 | 44+38% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Radeon RX Vega11 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M4000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega11 carries 0 MB. FirePro M4000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4000 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX Vega11.
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Radeon RX Vega11 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M4000 draws 33W versus the Radeon RX Vega11's 35W β a 5.9% difference. The FirePro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4000) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega11). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Radeon RX Vega11 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-6% | 35W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 82mm | β |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 75Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 48.4+5% | 45.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M4000 came in at $0, while the Radeon RX Vega11 launched at $150. On MSRP, FirePro M4000 was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro M4000) vs 10.7 (Radeon RX Vega11) β the FirePro M4000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega11 (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Radeon RX Vega11 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 10.7 |
| Codename | Chelsea | Raven |
| Release | June 27 2012 | May 10 2018 |
| Ranking | #752 | #673 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















