Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Quadro K3000M
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Quadro K3000M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Quadro K3000M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Quadro K3000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro K3000M
2012Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro K3000M is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Quadro K3000M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.
Quadro K3000M
The Quadro K3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 654 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,618 points. Launch price was $155.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 scores 1,582 and the Quadro K3000M reaches 1,618 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Quadro K3000M uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 576 (Quadro K3000M). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 0.7534 TFLOPS (Quadro K3000M).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Quadro K3000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,582 | 1,618+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 576+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6144 TFLOPS | 0.7534 TFLOPS+23% |
| ROPs | 6 | 32+433% |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Quadro K3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K3000M carries 2 GB. Quadro K3000M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and 64-bit on the Quadro K3000M.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Quadro K3000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 draws 15W versus the Quadro K3000M's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 350W (Quadro K3000M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Quadro K3000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 105.5+388% | 21.6 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Iris Pro Graphics P6300 (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Quadro K3000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | — |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3e | GK104 |
| Release | September 5 2014 | June 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #755 | #748 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and Quadro K3000M
