Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275X / M375

#459

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

2068%

#461

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1875%

#462

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1870%

#466

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1700%

#467

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1689%

#469

Radeon R9 M275X / M375

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

100%

#470

Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

100%

#471

Radeon R9 M370X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

100%

#472

Radeon HD 8280

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

99%

#473

GeForce GTX 850A

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

97%

#474

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8600/8700M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

97%

#475

Mobility Radeon HD 5730

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

97%

#476

Radeon R7 A10-7700K

MSRP: $152|Avg: $118

97%

#477

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8500M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

96%

#479

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

MSRP: $699|Avg: $150

95%

#480

Radeon HD 8510G + 8500M Dual

MSRP: $120|Avg: $35

95%

#481

Radeon R5 M330

MSRP: $120|Avg: $20

95%

#482

Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

94%

#483

GeForce GTX 760A

MSRP: $249|Avg: $40

94%

#484

Radeon R9 M270X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $40

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $300), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 502.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+502.7%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($50)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 M275X / M375 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and Radeon R9 M275X / M375

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.

Radeon R9 M275X / M375

The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 scores 1,582 and the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 reaches 1,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Boost clocks: 800 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Radeon R9 M275X / M375
G3D Mark Score	1,582	1,575
Architecture	Generation 8.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6144 TFLOPS	1.184 TFLOPS+93%
Boost Clock	800 MHz	925 MHz+16%
ROPs	6	16+167%
TMUs	48+20%	40

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Radeon R9 M275X / M375
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375).

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Radeon R9 M275X / M375
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12_0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 M275X / M375's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Radeon R9 M275X / M375
TDP	15W-80%	75W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	Mobile
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	105.5+402%	21.0

💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 launched at $300 and now averages $300. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 costs 83.3% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.6 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 5.3 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) — the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 offers 496.2% better value.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P6300	Radeon R9 M275X / M375
MSRP	$150-50%	$300
Avg Price (30d)	$50-83%	$300
Performance per Dollar	31.6+496%	5.3
Codename	Broadwell GT3e	Venus
Release	September 5 2014	January 28 2014
Ranking	#755	#746