GeForce GTX 555 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300
GeForce GTX 555
Popular choices:
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 555 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics P6300.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 555 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 555 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 555 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 69% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 555 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+69%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 555 and Iris Pro Graphics P6300
GeForce GTX 555
The GeForce GTX 555 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,604 points. Launch price was $149.
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 555 scores 1,604 and the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 reaches 1,582 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 555 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 uses Generation 8.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GTX 555) vs 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Raw compute: 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 555) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P6300).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,604+1% | 1,582 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 144 | 384+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4147 TFLOPS | 0.6144 TFLOPS+48% |
| ROPs | 16+167% | 6 |
| TMUs | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 555 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 555 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 555) vs 12 (11_1) (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 555 draws 70W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P6300's 15W — a 129.4% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 555) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 15W-79% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 210mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 22.9 | 105.5+361% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 555 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 launched at $150 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTX 555 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce GTX 555) vs 31.6 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) — the GeForce GTX 555 offers 69.3% better value. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-40% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5+69% | 31.6 |
| Codename | GF116 | Broadwell GT3e |
| Release | May 14 2011 | September 5 2014 |
| Ranking | #849 | #755 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 555 and Iris Pro Graphics P6300
