GeForce GTX 555 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 555

2011Core: 720 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

2014Core: 300 MHzBoost: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 555 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 555 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 555

2011

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 555 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 366.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 15W.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 70W, a 55W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 555 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (1,604 vs 1,582), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 555 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 555 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $150 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1.4% (10.7 vs 10.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 555 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 555

The GeForce GTX 555 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,604 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 555 scores 1,604 and the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 reaches 1,582 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 555 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 uses Generation 8.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GTX 555) vs 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Raw compute: 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 555) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P6300).

FeatureGeForce GTX 555Iris Pro Graphics P6300
G3D Mark Score
1,604+1%
1,582
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Generation 8.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
144
384+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4147 TFLOPS
0.6144 TFLOPS+48%
ROPs
16+167%
6
TMUs
24
48+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 555 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 555Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 555 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 555 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 555 and System on the Iris Pro Graphics P6300.

FeatureGeForce GTX 555Iris Pro Graphics P6300
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 555) vs 12 (11_1) (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6.

FeatureGeForce GTX 555Iris Pro Graphics P6300
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.2+9%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 555 draws 70W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P6300's 15W — a 129.4% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 555) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 555Iris Pro Graphics P6300
TDP
70W
15W-79%
Recommended PSU
450W
1W-100%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Integrated
Length
210mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
22.9
105.5+361%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 555 came in at $150, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 launched at $150. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.7 (GeForce GTX 555) vs 10.5 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) — the GeForce GTX 555 offers 1.9% better value. The newer card here is Iris Pro Graphics P6300 (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 555Iris Pro Graphics P6300
MSRP
$150
$150
Performance per Dollar
10.7+2%
10.5
Codename
GF116
Broadwell GT3e
Release
May 14 2011
September 5 2014
Ranking
#849
#755

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.