
Radeon 630 vs Radeon HD 6790

Radeon 630
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6790
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 630 is positioned at rank #292 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 630
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 630 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The Radeon 630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6790 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 6790 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 630 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 630 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $149 for the Radeon HD 6790, it costs 66% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 199.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 630 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+199.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($149) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 630 and Radeon HD 6790

Radeon 630
The Radeon 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.

Radeon HD 6790
The Radeon HD 6790 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 840 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,567 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 630 scores 1,575 and the Radeon HD 6790 reaches 1,567 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 630 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon HD 6790 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 630) vs 800 (Radeon HD 6790). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 630) vs 1.344 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6790).
| Feature | Radeon 630 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,575 | 1,567 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 800+56% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS | 1.344 TFLOPS+8% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 160 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 630 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 630 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6790 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 6790 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 630 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 630 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 6790's 150W — a 100% difference. The Radeon 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 630) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6790). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon 630 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 31.5+203% | 10.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 630 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon HD 6790 launched at $149 and now averages $149. The Radeon 630 costs 66.4% less ($99 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.5 (Radeon 630) vs 10.5 (Radeon HD 6790) — the Radeon 630 offers 200% better value. The Radeon 630 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon 630 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-33% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-66% | $149 |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.5+200% | 10.5 |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Barts |
| Release | May 13 2019 | April 4 2011 |
| Ranking | #757 | #759 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












