FirePro M4000 vs Radeon 630

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M4000 vs Radeon 630 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro M4000 vs Radeon 630: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M4000

2012

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Radeon 630

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅FirePro M4000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 630 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro M4000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (1,596 vs 1,575), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 630 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 630 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. FirePro M4000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro M4000 vs Radeon 630 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M4000

The FirePro M4000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,596 points.

Radeon 630

The Radeon 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4000 scores 1,596 and the Radeon 630 reaches 1,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon 630 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M4000) vs 512 (Radeon 630). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4000) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 630).

Feature	FirePro M4000	Radeon 630
G3D Mark Score	1,596+1%	1,575
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	512	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	1.247 TFLOPS+80%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	32
L1 Cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro M4000	Radeon 630
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M4000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 630 carries 512 MB. FirePro M4000 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4000 and 128-bit on the Radeon 630. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M4000) vs 512 KB (Radeon 630) — the Radeon 630 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro M4000	Radeon 630
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4000 draws 33W versus the Radeon 630's 50W — a 41% difference. The FirePro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4000) vs 350W (Radeon 630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro M4000	Radeon 630
TDP	33W-34%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	82mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	48.4+54%	31.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M4000 came in at $0, while the Radeon 630 launched at $100. On MSRP, FirePro M4000 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro M4000) vs 15.8 (Radeon 630) — the FirePro M4000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 630 (2019 vs 2012).

Feature	FirePro M4000	Radeon 630
MSRP	$0-100%	$100
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	15.8
Codename	Chelsea	Polaris 23
Release	June 27 2012	May 13 2019
Ranking	#752	#757

Search FirePro M4000 on Amazon

Search Radeon 630 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.