
GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Radeon 630
GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon 630 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon 630 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon 630: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
2011Why buy it
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 630 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2011 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌49% HIGHER MSRP$149 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 15.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌132% higher power demand at 116W vs 50W.
Radeon 630
2019Why buy it
- ✅26.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 50.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 10.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅GeForce GTX 550 Ti is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 630 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 116W, a 66W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon 630 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 550 Ti
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,558 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon 630
The Radeon 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti scores 1,558 and the Radeon 630 reaches 1,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon 630 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) vs 512 (Radeon 630). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 630).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 550 Ti | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,558 | 1,575+1% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 512+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 1.247 TFLOPS+80% |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 630 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 550 Ti | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 630 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 550 Ti gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 550 Ti and 128-bit on the Radeon 630. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) vs 512 KB (Radeon 630) — the Radeon 630 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 550 Ti | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti draws 116W versus the Radeon 630's 50W — a 79.5% difference. The Radeon 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon 630). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 550 Ti | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 116W | 50W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 13.4 | 31.5+135% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 550 Ti came in at $149, while the Radeon 630 launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon 630 was 32.9% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.5 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) vs 15.8 (Radeon 630) — the Radeon 630 offers 50.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 630 (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 550 Ti | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $100-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.5 | 15.8+50% |
| Codename | GF116 | Polaris 23 |
| Release | March 15 2011 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #761 | #757 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















