GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Quadro K2000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000

#107

Quadro P6000

MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500

98%

#108

Quadro M6000

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500

89%

#245

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

5596%

#260

GRID P4-8Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200

100%

#261

Quadro K2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $500

100%

#263

FirePro 3D V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $30

97%

#264

GRID M3-3020

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

95%

#265

GRID P40-8Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

95%

#266

GRID M40

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100

95%

#267

FirePro V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

94%

#268

FirePro V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $15

94%

#269

FirePro 3D V7800

MSRP: $759|Avg: $40

93%

#270

FirePro S9050

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825

93%

#271

FirePro R5000

MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150

91%

#272

GRID M6-8Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

90%

#275

GRID K120Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $20

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 550 Ti offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GTX 550 Ti	Quadro K2000
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+50%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 550 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 550 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $500), it costs 95% less, resulting in a 1869.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 550 Ti	Quadro K2000
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1869.7%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($25)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 550 Ti Benchmark Check

Quadro K2000 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 550 Ti and Quadro K2000

GeForce GTX 550 Ti

The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,558 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro K2000

The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 550 Ti scores 1,558 and the Quadro K2000 reaches 1,582 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro K2000 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) vs 384 (Quadro K2000). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) vs 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000).

Feature	GeForce GTX 550 Ti	Quadro K2000
G3D Mark Score	1,558	1,582+2%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	192	384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	0.7327 TFLOPS+6%
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	32	32
L1 Cache	256 KB+700%	32 KB
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 550 Ti	Quadro K2000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 550 Ti comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2000 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 550 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) vs 256 KB (Quadro K2000) — the GeForce GTX 550 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 550 Ti	Quadro K2000
VRAM Capacity	3 GB+50%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) vs H.264 (Quadro K2000).

Feature	GeForce GTX 550 Ti	Quadro K2000
Encoder	—	NVENC 1st gen
Decoder	—	NVDEC 1st gen
Codecs	H.264	H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 550 Ti draws 116W versus the Quadro K2000's 51W — a 77.8% difference. The Quadro K2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro K2000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 550 Ti	Quadro K2000
TDP	116W	51W-56%
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	202mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	13.4	31.0+131%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 550 Ti launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Quadro K2000 launched at $599 and now averages $500. The GeForce GTX 550 Ti costs 95% less ($475 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 62.3 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) vs 3.2 (Quadro K2000) — the GeForce GTX 550 Ti offers 1846.9% better value. The Quadro K2000 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).