
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M370X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M370X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M370X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 550 Ti.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 550 Ti | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 550 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $100), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 296.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 550 Ti | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+296.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 550 Ti and Radeon R9 M370X

GeForce GTX 550 Ti
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,558 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon R9 M370X
The Radeon R9 M370X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 19 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,570 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti scores 1,558 and the Radeon R9 M370X reaches 1,570 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M370X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M370X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 550 Ti | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,558 | 1,570 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 640+233% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 550 Ti | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M370X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M370X offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 550 Ti | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 M370X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 550 Ti | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | — | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti draws 116W versus the Radeon R9 M370X's 75W — a 42.9% difference. The Radeon R9 M370X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M370X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 550 Ti | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 116W | 75W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.4 | 20.9+56% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Radeon R9 M370X launched at $300 and now averages $100. The GeForce GTX 550 Ti costs 75% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 62.3 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) vs 15.7 (Radeon R9 M370X) — the GeForce GTX 550 Ti offers 296.8% better value. The Radeon R9 M370X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 550 Ti | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-50% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-75% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 62.3+297% | 15.7 |
| Codename | GF116 | Cape Verde |
| Release | March 15 2011 | May 19 2015 |
| Ranking | #761 | #758 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















