
GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Radeon R9 M275X / M375
GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 99.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M275X / M375 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌54.7% higher power demand at 116W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M275X / M375
2014Why buy it
- ✅6.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 116W, a 41W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌101.3% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 10.5 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 550 Ti
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,558 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon R9 M275X / M375
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti scores 1,558 and the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 reaches 1,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X / M375).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 550 Ti | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,558 | 1,575+1% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 640+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 1.184 TFLOPS+71% |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+60% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 550 Ti | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M275X / M375 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 550 Ti and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M275X / M375. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) — the GeForce GTX 550 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 550 Ti | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti draws 116W versus the Radeon R9 M275X / M375's 75W — a 42.9% difference. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 550 Ti | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 116W | 75W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.4 | 21.0+57% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 550 Ti came in at $149, while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 launched at $300. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 550 Ti was 50.3% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.5 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) vs 5.3 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) — the GeForce GTX 550 Ti offers 98.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M275X / M375 (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 550 Ti | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-50% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.5+98% | 5.3 |
| Codename | GF116 | Venus |
| Release | March 15 2011 | January 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #761 | #746 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















