Radeon 630 vs Radeon R9 M370X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 630 vs Radeon R9 M370X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 630 vs Radeon R9 M370X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 630

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 201% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 5.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Radeon R9 M370X is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 630 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M370X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon R9 M370X

2015

Why buy it

✅43.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
200% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.2 vs 15.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M370X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 43.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 630 instead at 1,575 vs 1,570, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 630 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 630 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $200 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 201% (15.8 vs 5.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 M370X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon 630 vs Radeon R9 M370X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 630

The Radeon 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.

Radeon R9 M370X

The Radeon R9 M370X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 19 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,570 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 630 scores 1,575 and the Radeon R9 M370X reaches 1,570 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 630 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 M370X uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 630) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M370X).

Feature	Radeon 630	Radeon R9 M370X
G3D Mark Score	1,575	1,570
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512	640+25%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 630	Radeon R9 M370X
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 630 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M370X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M370X gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon 630 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M370X.

Feature	Radeon 630	Radeon R9 M370X
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 630 draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M370X's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 630) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M370X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon 630	Radeon R9 M370X
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	31.5+51%	20.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 630 came in at $100, while the Radeon R9 M370X launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon 630 was 66.7% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.8 (Radeon 630) vs 5.2 (Radeon R9 M370X) — the Radeon 630 offers 203.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 630 (2019 vs 2015).

Feature	Radeon 630	Radeon R9 M370X
MSRP	$100-67%	$300
Performance per Dollar	15.8+204%	5.2
Codename	Polaris 23	Cape Verde
Release	May 13 2019	May 19 2015
Ranking	#757	#758

Search Radeon 630 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M370X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.