
Radeon 630
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M370X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 630 is positioned at rank 292 and the Radeon R9 M370X is on rank 471, so the Radeon 630 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 630
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M370X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 630 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M370X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M370X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 630 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 630 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $100 for the Radeon R9 M370X, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 100.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 630 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+100.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 630 and Radeon R9 M370X

Radeon 630
The Radeon 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.

Radeon R9 M370X
The Radeon R9 M370X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 19 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,570 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 630 scores 1,575 and the Radeon R9 M370X reaches 1,570 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 630 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 M370X uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 630) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M370X).
| Feature | Radeon 630 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,575 | 1,570 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 640+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 630 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 630 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M370X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M370X offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 630 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 630 draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M370X's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 630) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M370X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon 630 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 31.5+51% | 20.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 630 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R9 M370X launched at $300 and now averages $100. The Radeon 630 costs 50% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.5 (Radeon 630) vs 15.7 (Radeon R9 M370X) — the Radeon 630 offers 100.6% better value. The Radeon 630 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon 630 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-67% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-50% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.5+101% | 15.7 |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Cape Verde |
| Release | May 13 2019 | May 19 2015 |
| Ranking | #757 | #758 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













