Radeon HD 5750 vs FirePro M4170
Radeon HD 5750
Popular choices:
FirePro M4170
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 5750 is positioned at rank 143 and the FirePro M4170 is on rank 196, so the Radeon HD 5750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 5750
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M4170
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The FirePro M4170 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The FirePro M4170 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 5750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 5750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M4170 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 5750 | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 5750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 5750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $80), it costs 69% less, resulting in a 220.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 5750 | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+220.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 5750 and FirePro M4170
Radeon HD 5750
The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.
FirePro M4170
The FirePro M4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 5750 scores 1,169 and the FirePro M4170 reaches 1,168 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5750 is built on TeraScale 2 while the FirePro M4170 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 720 (Radeon HD 5750) vs 384 (FirePro M4170). Raw compute: 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5750) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4170).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,169 | 1,168 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 720+88% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.008 TFLOPS+46% | 0.6912 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 36+50% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 72 KB | 96 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 5750 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro M4170 has 4 GB. The FirePro M4170 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon HD 5750) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4170).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | — | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 5750 draws 86W versus the FirePro M4170's 150W — a 54.2% difference. The Radeon HD 5750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 5750) vs 350W (FirePro M4170). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 86W-43% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.6+74% | 7.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 5750 launched at $130 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the FirePro M4170 launched at $200 and now averages $80. The Radeon HD 5750 costs 68.8% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 46.8 (Radeon HD 5750) vs 14.6 (FirePro M4170) — the Radeon HD 5750 offers 220.5% better value. The FirePro M4170 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $130-35% | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-69% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.8+221% | 14.6 |
| Codename | Juniper | Opal |
| Release | October 13 2009 | April 23 2015 |
| Ranking | #834 | #838 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 5750 and FirePro M4170
