Radeon HD 5750 vs NVS 810
Radeon HD 5750
Popular choices:
NVS 810
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 5750 is positioned at rank 143 and the NVS 810 is on rank 309, so the Radeon HD 5750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 5750
Performance Per Dollar NVS 810
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The NVS 810 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The NVS 810 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 5750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The NVS 810 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 5750.
| Insight | Radeon HD 5750 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 5750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 5750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $80), it costs 69% less, resulting in a 213.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 5750 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+213.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 5750 and NVS 810
Radeon HD 5750
The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.
NVS 810
The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 5750 scores 1,169 and the NVS 810 reaches 1,192 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5750 is built on TeraScale 2 while the NVS 810 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 720 (Radeon HD 5750) vs 512 (NVS 810). Raw compute: 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5750) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,169 | 1,192+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 720+41% | 512 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.008 TFLOPS | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2+5% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 36+13% | 32 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 72 KB | 256 KB+256% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 5750 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the NVS 810 has 4 GB. The NVS 810 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 5750) vs 1 MB (NVS 810) — the NVS 810 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon HD 5750) vs H.264,H.265 (NVS 810).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | NVENC 5 |
| Decoder | — | NVDEC 2 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 5750 draws 86W versus the NVS 810's 68W — a 23.4% difference. The NVS 810 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 5750) vs 350W (NVS 810). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 86W | 68W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 198mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.6 | 17.5+29% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 5750 launched at $130 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the NVS 810 launched at $700 and now averages $80. The Radeon HD 5750 costs 68.8% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 46.8 (Radeon HD 5750) vs 14.9 (NVS 810) — the Radeon HD 5750 offers 214.1% better value. The NVS 810 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $130-81% | $700 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-69% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.8+214% | 14.9 |
| Codename | Juniper | GM107 |
| Release | October 13 2009 | November 4 2015 |
| Ranking | #834 | #826 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 5750 and NVS 810
