Radeon HD 5750 vs Radeon R9 M265X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 5750 vs Radeon R9 M265X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 5750 vs Radeon R9 M265X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 5750

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 54.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M265X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2009 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 M265X

2014

Why buy it

✅15.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
53.8% HIGHER MSRP
$200 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M265X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 5750 instead at 1,169 vs 1,167, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 5750 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 5750 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $70 cheaper on MSRP at $130 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 54.1% (9.0 vs 5.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 M265X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon HD 5750 vs Radeon R9 M265X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 5750

The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.

Radeon R9 M265X

The Radeon R9 M265X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,167 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 5750 scores 1,169 and the Radeon R9 M265X reaches 1,167 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5750 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R9 M265X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 720 (Radeon HD 5750) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M265X). Raw compute: 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5750) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M265X).

Feature	Radeon HD 5750	Radeon R9 M265X
G3D Mark Score	1,169	1,167
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	720+13%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.008 TFLOPS+26%	0.8 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	36	40+11%
L1 Cache	72 KB	160 KB+122%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 5750	Radeon R9 M265X
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 5750 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M265X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M265X gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5750 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M265X.

Feature	Radeon HD 5750	Radeon R9 M265X
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	4 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 5750 draws 86W versus the Radeon R9 M265X's 75W — a 13.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M265X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 5750) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M265X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon HD 5750	Radeon R9 M265X
TDP	86W	75W-13%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	Mobile
Perf/Watt	13.6	15.6+15%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 5750 came in at $130, while the Radeon R9 M265X launched at $200. On MSRP, Radeon HD 5750 was 35% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.0 (Radeon HD 5750) vs 5.8 (Radeon R9 M265X) — the Radeon HD 5750 offers 55.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M265X (2014 vs 2009).

Feature	Radeon HD 5750	Radeon R9 M265X
MSRP	$130-35%	$200
Performance per Dollar	9.0+55%	5.8
Codename	Juniper	Venus
Release	October 13 2009	March 21 2014
Ranking	#834	#839

Search Radeon HD 5750 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M265X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.