GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 5750

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 5750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 5750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 295

2009

Why buy it

✅74.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅75% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
283.8% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
❌236% higher power demand at 289W vs 86W.

Radeon HD 5750

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $369 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 274.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Draws 86W instead of 289W, a 203W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 295 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2009 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 295 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 74.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (1,198 vs 1,169), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 295 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 5750 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $369 cheaper on MSRP at $130 vs $499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 274.6% (9.0 vs 2.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 5750 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 295 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 5750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 295

The GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 480 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 289W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,198 points. Launch price was $500.

Radeon HD 5750

The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 295 scores 1,198 and the Radeon HD 5750 reaches 1,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 295 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 5750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 720 (Radeon HD 5750). Raw compute: 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5750).

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	Radeon HD 5750
G3D Mark Score	1,198+2%	1,169
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	480 ×2	720+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5962 TFLOPS ×2	1.008 TFLOPS+69%
ROPs	28 ×2+75%	16
TMUs	80 ×2+122%	36
L2 Cache	224 KB	256 KB+14%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 295 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 5750 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	Radeon HD 5750
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 295 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5750 carries 1 GB. GeForce GTX 295 gives you 75% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 295 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5750. L2 Cache: 224 KB (GeForce GTX 295) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 5750) — the Radeon HD 5750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	Radeon HD 5750
VRAM Capacity	1.75 GB+75%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	224 KB	256 KB+14%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 295) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 5750).

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	Radeon HD 5750
Encoder	PureVideo HD VP2	—
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP2	—
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 295 draws 289W versus the Radeon HD 5750's 86W — a 108.3% difference. The Radeon HD 5750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 680W (GeForce GTX 295) vs 450W (Radeon HD 5750). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	Radeon HD 5750
TDP	289W	86W-70%
Recommended PSU	680W	450W-34%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	95°C	—
Perf/Watt	4.1	13.6+232%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 295 came in at $499, while the Radeon HD 5750 launched at $130. On MSRP, Radeon HD 5750 was 73.9% cheaper ($369 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 9.0 (Radeon HD 5750) — the Radeon HD 5750 offers 275% better value.

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	Radeon HD 5750
MSRP	$499	$130-74%
Performance per Dollar	2.4	9.0+275%
Codename	GT200B	Juniper
Release	January 8 2009	October 13 2009
Ranking	#816	#834

Search GeForce GTX 295 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 5750 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.